지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.3
- 수록면
- 235 - 272 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2022.3.93.235
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The process of change in the world perception of Mao Zedong and the CCP before the reform era was ultimately a process of struggling to establish an independent worldview. From the beginning of its foundation, the CCP interpreted the international situation from the viewpoint of ‘world revolution’ rather than from the Chinese reality, accepting the world view of the Comintern as it is. As a consequence, the CCP subordinated the strategy of the Chinese revolution to the interests of the Soviet Union and the Comintern’s world revolution. Although it is true that Mao stressed the importance of ‘independence and self-reliance’, the CCP’s official world view and interpretation of international circumstances, even after Mao’s rise to power in the party, was basically a copy of Comintern’s viewpoint, at least until the end of the Sino-Japanese war.
Mao Zedong’s ‘intermediate-zone’ theory, which was raised in 1946, was a very important turning point in the centenary of the CCP’s world perception in that it was the starting point for establishing an independent worldview based on the ‘attitude toward China’. During Mao’s era, this ‘intermediate-zone’ theory showed various variations and finally resulted in the ‘three-worlds theory’ of the 1970s. Also, even when there was a paradigm shift in the CCP’s world strategy under the discourse of ‘peace and development’ in Deng Xiaoping’s era, assessing other countries’ attitude towards China has always been at the core of CCP’s world perception since 1946. During Mao’s period, when the antagonistic ideological atmosphere prevailed in the Cold War regime, it was expressed in the ideological concept and term of ‘anti-imperialism’. But after Deng Xiaoping, when ideological confrontation weakened, ‘anti-hegemonism’ became the new keyword, which was a more specific and exact expression in explaining the worldview of Mao’s and Deng’s era.
The world perceptions of the CCP in the Mao’s and Deng’s era were basically ‘responsive’ in that they took the attitude of foreign powers toward China as the core factor of their perception. However, following the rise of China in the end of the 20th century, important changes have been taking place in this ‘responsive’ world view. The CCP is gradually admitting its status as a world power and is actively demonstrating its will to reform the international regime according to ‘Chinese standards’. These changes appearing in the 21st century are very different from the CCP’s world perception that has been maintained throughout Mao’s and Deng’s era. Breaking away from the existing worldview which was focused on understanding the international situation mainly in response to external threats, China is now seeing itself as the center of world civilization and is revealing its grand ambition to reconstruct the world order based on Chinese model.
‘Modern Chinese nationalism’ and ‘Traditional Sino-centrism’ were the two pillars that constituted the CCP’s worldview in the past 100 years. Whereas the former became the main melody in the eras of Mao and Deng, as China accomplished its basic goals of nationalism at the end of the 20th century, it is very likely that the center of gravity gradually shifted to the latter.
Mao Zedong’s ‘intermediate-zone’ theory, which was raised in 1946, was a very important turning point in the centenary of the CCP’s world perception in that it was the starting point for establishing an independent worldview based on the ‘attitude toward China’. During Mao’s era, this ‘intermediate-zone’ theory showed various variations and finally resulted in the ‘three-worlds theory’ of the 1970s. Also, even when there was a paradigm shift in the CCP’s world strategy under the discourse of ‘peace and development’ in Deng Xiaoping’s era, assessing other countries’ attitude towards China has always been at the core of CCP’s world perception since 1946. During Mao’s period, when the antagonistic ideological atmosphere prevailed in the Cold War regime, it was expressed in the ideological concept and term of ‘anti-imperialism’. But after Deng Xiaoping, when ideological confrontation weakened, ‘anti-hegemonism’ became the new keyword, which was a more specific and exact expression in explaining the worldview of Mao’s and Deng’s era.
The world perceptions of the CCP in the Mao’s and Deng’s era were basically ‘responsive’ in that they took the attitude of foreign powers toward China as the core factor of their perception. However, following the rise of China in the end of the 20th century, important changes have been taking place in this ‘responsive’ world view. The CCP is gradually admitting its status as a world power and is actively demonstrating its will to reform the international regime according to ‘Chinese standards’. These changes appearing in the 21st century are very different from the CCP’s world perception that has been maintained throughout Mao’s and Deng’s era. Breaking away from the existing worldview which was focused on understanding the international situation mainly in response to external threats, China is now seeing itself as the center of world civilization and is revealing its grand ambition to reconstruct the world order based on Chinese model.
‘Modern Chinese nationalism’ and ‘Traditional Sino-centrism’ were the two pillars that constituted the CCP’s worldview in the past 100 years. Whereas the former became the main melody in the eras of Mao and Deng, as China accomplished its basic goals of nationalism at the end of the 20th century, it is very likely that the center of gravity gradually shifted to the latter.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 세계인식의 종속(1921-1945): 코민테른에의 추종
Ⅱ. 마오쩌둥과 세계인식의 독립(1946-1976): ‘제국주의’와 ‘태도’
Ⅲ. 덩샤오핑 시기의 연속과 단절(1978-1990s): ‘태도’의 중요성, ‘진영’의 해체
맺음말: 21세기의 ‘지속’과 ‘변화’
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
마오쩌둥의 세계 인식과 ‘中間地帶論’의 變奏(1946~76)
중국근현대사연구
2021 .06
-
조선어 한자어접사의 형음의의 대응관계 연구
중국조선어문
2017 .05
-
“巨X”结构中非范畴化X的语法特征考察
중국학
2022 .09
-
개념적혼성에서 본 조선어은유적합성명사의 의미구성
중국조선어문
2016 .07
-
‘中間地帶論’과 ‘一邊倒’ 노선의 연속성 - 건국 전후 시기 毛澤東의 세계 인식을 중심으로 -
동양사학연구
2019 .09
-
포스트 서구 시대에 대한 중국의 구상- 서구 민주주의에 대한 인식과 대안 -
한중관계연구
2018 .01
-
코퍼스를 활용한 중국어 유의어 분석 방법론 試探 : 유의어 ‘産生’, ‘發生’을 중심으로
중국어교육과연구
2018 .06
-
中共 100년의 마오와 마오이즘 — 기원, 해석, 전유 —
중국근현대사연구
2021 .09
-
현대중국어 ‘一旦’과 한국어 ‘일단’의 의미 대조
중국어교육과연구
2017 .12
-
“A+着+N”의 의미 구조 고찰
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .11
-
齊白石之藝術世界與其和平思想之特徵
중국어문학논집
2019 .06
-
關東州 중국인의 사법권을 둘러싼 중 · 일의 각축 - 개평사건(1907-1908)을 중심으로 -
동양사학연구
2022 .12
-
“V过的N”中“过”的句法语义
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2020 .08
-
小说<孔乙己>话语中的权势性人际意义研究
한중인문학연구
2020 .01
-
광복 직후 대만에서 국어운동의 전개와 의의
중국근현대사연구
2022 .12
-
조선어 복합조사 ‘밖에’의 산생과정과 의미특성 고찰
중국조선어문
2022 .01
-
[V+아/어+들다]형 합성동사의 의미 고찰
중국조선어문
2017 .05
-
“남자”류의어 사용과 의미 연구
중국조선어문
2016 .03
-
마오쩌둥(毛澤東) 文化思想의 이론기원과 民衆文化觀
중국학
2019 .01
-
주변부의 근대문학 - 여천 이원조 연구(2) -
사이間SAI
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
마오쩌둥(毛澤東)의 옌안(延安)체제 재편과 가오강(高崗) 사건
안치영
서강인문논총
2015
.12
정신장애인에 대한 대학생의 편견과 차별 : AIDS, 수형자 사례 유형과의 비교
박근우
,
서미경
사회과학연구
2012
.12
마오쩌둥의 세계 인식과 ‘中間地帶論’의 變奏(1946~76)
이원준
중국근현대사연구
2021
.06
종전(終戰) 후 국·공간 내전과 승패 요인에 관한 연구
오수열
,
김광수
,
정순동
한국동북아논총
2017
.03
1940년 전후 동북항일연군 · 조선의용군의 변화와 중국 · 소련 관계
김선호
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2017
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0