지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동아인문학회 동아인문학 東亞人文學 第59輯
- 발행연도
- 2022.6
- 수록면
- 43 - 61 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.52639/JEAH.2022.06.59.43
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The nose is an important organ responsible for the sense of smell, which is the most primitive sense of human beings. This feeling plays a very important role in people"s cognition of the external world. The corresponding words for smell in Chinese and Korean are “嗅”，“闻” and “맡다” respectively. The metaphorical expressions of the three words are analyzed through the corpus, and the similarities and differences between the three words ard found. At the same time, the connection between the sense of smell and the other senses is the contained in this paper.
First, the origin domain of the three words is the same, which is the olfactory domain that uses the nose to identify smells. From this common origin domain, “嗅” and “闻” are mapped to two common target domains of “discovery” and “perception, feeling” respectively. Furthermore “嗅” also maps to the two target domains of “discrimination” and “exploration”. The Korean “맡다” only maps to the target domain of “perception, feeling”. The reason why the three words produce such a mapping is that they are all based on the most elemental function of smell.
The reason for the difference between “嗅” and “闻” is that at the beginning of is creation, “闻” was just an action of listening to the sound with the ear, and in the process of semantic evolution, the meaning of the nose to distinguish odors was gradually generated. And “맡다” is because the lexicalizatin function has been complemented by the cognitive means of metaphor, and Korean is accustomed to using other expressions in language use. In addition, the olfactory domain of Chinese is mapped to the visual domain, the auditory domain and the integrated sensory domain, while the Korean language is only mapped to the integrated sensory domain. This shows that the sense of smell in Korean is not closely linked to vision and hearing, which also results in relatively few metaphorical expressions of “맡다”.
First, the origin domain of the three words is the same, which is the olfactory domain that uses the nose to identify smells. From this common origin domain, “嗅” and “闻” are mapped to two common target domains of “discovery” and “perception, feeling” respectively. Furthermore “嗅” also maps to the two target domains of “discrimination” and “exploration”. The Korean “맡다” only maps to the target domain of “perception, feeling”. The reason why the three words produce such a mapping is that they are all based on the most elemental function of smell.
The reason for the difference between “嗅” and “闻” is that at the beginning of is creation, “闻” was just an action of listening to the sound with the ear, and in the process of semantic evolution, the meaning of the nose to distinguish odors was gradually generated. And “맡다” is because the lexicalizatin function has been complemented by the cognitive means of metaphor, and Korean is accustomed to using other expressions in language use. In addition, the olfactory domain of Chinese is mapped to the visual domain, the auditory domain and the integrated sensory domain, while the Korean language is only mapped to the integrated sensory domain. This shows that the sense of smell in Korean is not closely linked to vision and hearing, which also results in relatively few metaphorical expressions of “맡다”.
목차
中国语抄录
Ⅰ. 绪论
Ⅱ. “嗅”、“闻”和“맡다”的隐喻分析
Ⅲ. “嗅”、“闻”和“맡다”的隐喻对比
Ⅳ. 总结
参考文献
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
「韓日両語における『共感覚的比喩』の一方向性仮説の普遍性と反例 ―韓国人日本語学習者による日本語嗅覚表現に関する予備調査の結果から―」
日本語敎育
2022 .06
-
汉·韩语“嗅、闻”和“맡다”的隐喻对比分析
한국중국어교육학회 학술대회
2022 .03
-
냄새 맡는 인간, 냄새 나는 텍스트 -한국 근대문학과 냄새
구보학보
2019 .01
-
제임스 조이스의 율리시스 에 나타난 냄새 읽기 ―예술적 통합을 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2023 .02
-
论汉韩空间维度词 “高” 和 “높다” 的跨域认知
어문론총
2015 .12
-
嗅覚をあらわす形容詞の意味拡張について ―「かぐわしい」「芳しい」「香ばしい」の評価性の例から―
日本語敎育
2022 .12
-
平安王朝の香り - 『枕草子』と｢香｣ -
일본어문학
2023 .05
-
포크너와 타자의 냄새
미국소설
2021 .11
-
타자에 의하여 감각된 조선 -J. S. 게일의 『Korean Sketches』과 『Korea in Transition』의 후각성을 중심으로-
언어사실과 관점
2020 .01
-
일본 고대의 香道과 香文化 : 향의 문학적 기능을 중심으로
일본문화학보
2015 .05
-
从隐喻和转喻的角度分析现代汉语温度词热的词义引申现象
한국중국어교육학회 학술대회
2017 .06
-
은유의 언어학적 분석 및 해석
영어영문학
2016 .02
-
영어에 나타나는 여성은유
영어학
2020 .03
-
汉·韩语“睁”和“뜨다”的隐喻对比浅析
국제언어문학
2022 .08
-
SELF Metaphors in the Picturebook Hey, Al
영어학
2023 .01
-
Primary Metaphors for LIFE IS A BASEBALL GAME
영어학
2022 .01
-
论中国网络新四字成语形成中的认知机制
중국언어연구
2017 .04
-
인지언어학적 관점에서의 은유와 은유 번역 분석 : 대통령과 장관 연설문 텍스트를 중심으로
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
Beauty Metaphors in Advertising in American and Russian Women’s Fashion Magazines
영어영문학21
2017 .01
-
중한 정치 연설문에 나타난 ‘여행 은유’ 번역 연구
통역과 번역
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-001-001538017