메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Gwanhi Yun (Daegu University) Minkyung Lee (Daegu University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.22
발행연도
2022.1
수록면
528 - 546 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As phonologically-documented, in vowel-vowel (VV) sequences within words or across word boundaries, when the first word ends in one of the non-high vowels such as /ǝ, ɑ, ç/ and the following vowel gets unstressed, intrusive r is added intervocalically. This paper attempts to examine and analyze whether such /r/-epenthesis takes place to avoid vowel hiatus in the speeches of Korean L2 English speakers (KS) collected from the production task compared to those of English native speakers (ES) extracted from the Buckeye Corpus of spontaneous conversational speech. As stimuli for both KS and ES, VV sequences across word boundaries are mainly targeted based on the possible anti-hiatus strategies, i.e. r-intrusion, glottal stop insertion and vowel deletion as well as canonical variant. Interestingly but strikingly, r-intrusion is hardly observed in both groups. For the tokens of ES, vowel hiatus predominantly arose and vowel elision was second-best. For the KS’s tokens, no r was embedded, either. However, Korean L2 English speakers behave differently given their English proficiency. For KS with low proficiency (LP), a pause between two vowels results in glottal stop insertion but a canonical form is the most favored with no pause. However, for KS with high proficiency (HP), a pause is hardly placed in hiatus contexts and canonical variants predominantly surface. Unlike LP KS, a pause does not play a key factor to apply any other anti-hiatal strategies and further the effect of vowel height is quite significant, i.e., hiatus is more tolerated in V1-non-high than in V1-high. Contrary to the phonological claims of intrusive r as a hiatus breaker, vowel hiatus remains intact with no r intruded.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
3. English Speakers’ Production of Vowel Hiatus
4. Korean Speakers’ Production of Vowel Sequences
5. General Discussion
6. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0