지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.6
- 수록면
- 145 - 153 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: While online orthopedic resources are becoming an increasingly popular avenue for patient education, videos on YouTube are not subject to peer review. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the quality of YouTube videos for patient education in ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow.
Methods: A search of keywords for UCL injury was conducted through the YouTube search engine. Each video was categorized by source and content. Video quality, reliability, and accuracy were assessed by two independent raters using five metrics: (1) Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0–4) for video reliability; (2) modified DISCERN score (range 1–5) for video reliability; (3) Global Quality Score (GQS; range 1–5) for video quality; (4) ulnar collateral ligament-specific score (UCL-SS; range 0–16), a novel score for comprehensiveness of health information presented; and (5) accuracy score (AS; range 1–3) for accuracy.
Results: Video content was comprised predominantly of disease-specific information (52%) and surgical technique (33%). The most common video sources were physician (42%) and commercial (23%). The mean JAMA score, modified DISCERN score, GQS, UCL-SS, and AS were 1.8, 2.4, 1.9, 5.3, and 2.7 respectively.
Conclusions: Overall, YouTube is not a reliable or high-quality source for patients seeking information regarding UCL injuries, especially with videos uploaded by non-physician sources. The multiplicity of low quality, low reliability, and irrelevant videos can create a cumbersome and even inaccurate learning experience for patients.
Methods: A search of keywords for UCL injury was conducted through the YouTube search engine. Each video was categorized by source and content. Video quality, reliability, and accuracy were assessed by two independent raters using five metrics: (1) Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0–4) for video reliability; (2) modified DISCERN score (range 1–5) for video reliability; (3) Global Quality Score (GQS; range 1–5) for video quality; (4) ulnar collateral ligament-specific score (UCL-SS; range 0–16), a novel score for comprehensiveness of health information presented; and (5) accuracy score (AS; range 1–3) for accuracy.
Results: Video content was comprised predominantly of disease-specific information (52%) and surgical technique (33%). The most common video sources were physician (42%) and commercial (23%). The mean JAMA score, modified DISCERN score, GQS, UCL-SS, and AS were 1.8, 2.4, 1.9, 5.3, and 2.7 respectively.
Conclusions: Overall, YouTube is not a reliable or high-quality source for patients seeking information regarding UCL injuries, especially with videos uploaded by non-physician sources. The multiplicity of low quality, low reliability, and irrelevant videos can create a cumbersome and even inaccurate learning experience for patients.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in the Elbow of Sports Players
대한견주관절의학회지
2020 .03
-
Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Overhead Athletes
대한견주관절의학회지
2019 .12
-
The quality and reliability of YouTube videos on All-on-four concept
대한치과의사협회지
2022 .09
-
Evaluation of online video content related to reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a YouTube-based study
대한견주관절의학회지
2023 .06
-
Arthroscopic lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
YouTube as a source of information about pulpotomy and pulp capping: a cross sectional reliability analysis
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
2021 .08
-
Stress ultrasound for medial ulnar collateral ligament injury in athlete: Is US alone enough for diagnosis? (correlation with MRI)
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2019 .03
-
YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease
대한견주관절의학회지
2022 .09
-
YouTube as an information source for instrument separation in root canal treatment
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
2021 .01
-
Reliability and Quality of Korean YouTube Videos for Education Regarding Gout
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2021 .11
-
Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2023 .02
-
YouTube as a Source of Information on Public Health Ethics
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2024 .02
-
YouTube as a source of information about rubber dam: quality and content analysis
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
2024 .02
-
야구 선수에서 척측 측부 인대 손상의 중력 외반 부하 초음파 검사
대한스포츠의학회지
2015 .01
-
Evaluation of YouTube Videos Regarding Clean Intermittent Catheterization Application
International Neurourology Journal
2020 .01
-
Correlation between MRI Findings of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament and Ligament Laxity in Asymptomatic Professional Baseball Pitchers
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2017 .03
-
A Three Dimensional Computed Tomography Modeling for Kinematic Analysis of Double Strands Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction
대한견주관절의학회 학술대회논문집
2018 .03
-
Evaluation of YouTube videos as sources of information about complex regional pain syndrome
The Korean Journal of Pain
2022 .07
-
Ulnar collateral ligament repair in professional baseball players
대한견주관절의학회지
2024 .09
-
Utility Evaluation of Information from YouTube on Breastfeeding for Preterm Babies
Neonatal medicine
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0