지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
2023
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Standard form contracts have been commonly used in international commercial transactions since at least the late nineteenth century. In a typical commercial transaction for the sale of goods, the transaction is not confined to one standard form contract. The battle of forms that result from the exchange of standard form contracts. There are two main questions that have to be solved in the battle of forms. That is, Is there a contract? and If there is, what are the terms of the contract?There are many methods to solve in the battle of forms transactions, including mirror image rule, first shot doctrine, last shot doctrine, CISG and knock-out rule, etc. When dispute arise on the formation of contract in the International sale of goods, some courts apply the last shot rule, some the knock-out rule and some fabricate alternative solutions. The different solutions bring uncertainty in international transactions whereby decisions depend on the judge handling the particular case.In recent, the UNIDROIT Principle and PECL have explicit provisions that deal with the issue of battle of forms. Both incorporate the knock-out rule in the determining the terms of the contract. Therefore, I suggest that a proper approach to resolve the battle of the forms is the knock-out rule and code's gap-fillers applying.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0