지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to call into question Kantian cosmopolitanism by pointing out ‘economic’ limits of Kantian cosmopolitan tolerance and as a way of getting over the ‘economic’ limits of Kantian cosmopolitanism, to propose Derridian idea of ‘aneconomic’ hospitality. With the ‘economic’ idea of ‘common possession of the surface of the earth’ by human beings, Kant develops ‘a right of temporary sojourn’ as a compensation for occupation of ‘a particular part of the earth’ which infringes on the ‘common right to the face of the earth.’ Kant’s idea of ‘tolerate the presence of each other’ is purely based on the economic. First, Kant puts the earth as one of ‘standing-reserve’ in Heideggerian sense of technology since the earth can be possessed like one of economic resources or properties. Rendering the earth ‘standing-reserve’ results in putting other human beings endowed with the ‘common right to the earth’ into ‘standing-reserve’ of the system which doles out ‘a right of temporary sojourn’ or tolerance.
Criticizing Kantian cosmopolitanism, Derrida excavates hospitality underneath the Kant’s idea of ‘common possession of the surface of the earth.’ Derrida says, ‘the earth gives hospitality before all else’ to the occupants of the surface of the earth. The ‘aneconomic’ hospitality precedes the ‘economic’ right of possession of the earth. According to Derrida, the ‘aneconomic’ gives birth to the ‘economic’ as shown in gift. He exposes hospitality as a precondition of tolerance. Tolerance is suggested as a form of ‘economic’ accommodation of ‘aneconomic’ hospitality. The ‘aneconomic’ hospitality breaks the ‘economic’ system that produces rights and tolerance based on ‘economic’ exchange or debt. The ‘aneconomic’ rupture liberates the ‘economic’ from its own prison and pushes it to ‘invent’ the ‘other economic.’ The ‘economic,’ the possible must be prepared to welcome hospitality given by the ‘aneconomic,’ the ‘im-possible,’ for the future of the ‘other’ economic, the ‘other’ possible.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
구자광 / 2008 / ＂도래할 민주주의＂: 지젝 vs. 데리다 / 라깡과 현대정신분석 10(2):7~26
구자광 / 2008 / ‘생물지역주의’의 위험성과 가능성 — 게리 스나이더의 경우 / 동서비교문학저널 (19):7~32
구자광 / 2009 / 데리다와 아감벤의 인간/동물관계에 근거한 윤리학과 정치학에 대한 연구 / 새한영어영문학 51(3):1~21
구자광 / 2010 / 코즈모폴리턴 ‘생물지역주의’― 게리 스나이더의 경우 / 현대영미시연구 16(1):1~28
신문수 / 2007 / 장소, 인간, 생태적 삶 / 문학과 환경 6(1):57~79
구자광 / 2008 / ‘생물지역주의’의 위험성과 가능성 — 게리 스나이더의 경우 / 동서비교문학저널 (19):7~32
구자광 / 2009 / 데리다와 아감벤의 인간/동물관계에 근거한 윤리학과 정치학에 대한 연구 / 새한영어영문학 51(3):1~21
구자광 / 2010 / 코즈모폴리턴 ‘생물지역주의’― 게리 스나이더의 경우 / 현대영미시연구 16(1):1~28
신문수 / 2007 / 장소, 인간, 생태적 삶 / 문학과 환경 6(1):57~79
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0