지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.101 No.6
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 350 - 359 (10page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: This study was performed to compare the efficacies of newly developed needle grasper-assisted (Endo Relief) single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (NASILA) and single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA).
Methods: This study enrolled 110 patients with acute appendicitis without periappendiceal abscess, diagnosed using computed tomography, who were randomized to the SILA (n = 54) and NASILA groups (n = 56) between December 2017 and August 2018 (6 patients withdrawn). The NASILA technique entailed a small umbilical incision for the glove port (equivalent to that for a 12-mm trocar), and a 2.5-mm suprapubic incision for the needle grasper.
Results: The SILA and NASILA groups included 49 (male, 61.2%) and 55 (male, 54.5%) patients, respectively. Age, body mass index, abdominal surgical history, symptom duration, and use of patient-controlled analgesia did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The main wound size was significantly smaller in the NASILA group than in the SILA group (1.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.2 ± 0.4 cm, P < 0.001). The operative time and estimated blood loss did not differ significantly between both groups. The immediate postoperative pain score, i.e., the primary endpoint, was significantly lower in the NASILA group than in the SILA group (2.33 ± 0.98 vs. 2.82 ± 1.29, P = 0.031). The complaints for scar status 1 month postoperatively did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion: NASILA could attenuate postoperative pain by minimizing the size of the surgical wound; further, NASILA may not be inferior to SILA in terms of cosmetic results.
Methods: This study enrolled 110 patients with acute appendicitis without periappendiceal abscess, diagnosed using computed tomography, who were randomized to the SILA (n = 54) and NASILA groups (n = 56) between December 2017 and August 2018 (6 patients withdrawn). The NASILA technique entailed a small umbilical incision for the glove port (equivalent to that for a 12-mm trocar), and a 2.5-mm suprapubic incision for the needle grasper.
Results: The SILA and NASILA groups included 49 (male, 61.2%) and 55 (male, 54.5%) patients, respectively. Age, body mass index, abdominal surgical history, symptom duration, and use of patient-controlled analgesia did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The main wound size was significantly smaller in the NASILA group than in the SILA group (1.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.2 ± 0.4 cm, P < 0.001). The operative time and estimated blood loss did not differ significantly between both groups. The immediate postoperative pain score, i.e., the primary endpoint, was significantly lower in the NASILA group than in the SILA group (2.33 ± 0.98 vs. 2.82 ± 1.29, P = 0.031). The complaints for scar status 1 month postoperatively did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusion: NASILA could attenuate postoperative pain by minimizing the size of the surgical wound; further, NASILA may not be inferior to SILA in terms of cosmetic results.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Needle Grasper Assisted Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in a small hospital
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .07
-
Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Annals of Coloproctology
2021 .08
-
Interval Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Emergency Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy : A Retrospective Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Acute appendicitis after liver transplantation: A single center experience and review of the literature
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2020 .02
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Perioperative Outcomes of Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Compared to Three Port Appendectomy Combined Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .07
-
Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy is a useful surgical option for pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis : a comparison with conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .07
-
Learning curve in laparoscopic appendectomy: training strategy of laparoscopic surgery
Annals of Coloproctology
2022 .06
-
Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis during Pregnancy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Comparison of Surgical Strategies and Outcomes for Appendectomy Before/After Covid-19 Pandemic
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Predicting who will Fail Early Discharge after Laparoscopic Appendectomy with a Clinical Pathway
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Relationship Between Appendectomy Incidence and Computed Tomography Scans Based on Korean Nationwide Data, 2003–2017
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2022 .01
-
Effect of bupivacaine on postoperative pain and analgesics use after single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: double-blind randomized study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2020 .02
-
Single-Port Laparoscopic Interval Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis With a Periappendiceal Abscess
Annals of Coloproctology
2016 .01
-
Can We Reduce the Complications Following Acute Appendectomy?
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .05
-
Analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine wound infusion after laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .10
-
Was There Any Difference of Outcome in Pediatric Appendectomy Patients in Covid 19 Era?
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0