메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김동욱 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국영어영문학회 영어영문학 영어영문학 제61권 제4호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
611 - 627 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The year 1881, ten years before Thomas Hardy’s masterpiece Tess of the d’Urbervilles (1891) was published, marked a centenary of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) that was held in high esteem by Victorians. Despite the revival of Kant’s philosophy at that time, however, Victorians tended to present themselves as Kantians and anti-Kantians, especially as Kant’s concept of so-called transcendental idealism was put under philosophical scrutiny, and Hardy was one of those Victorians with reservations about this Kantian transcendental deduction. The aim of this paper is to briefly examine the ways that Hardy as an artist received Kant and then, to suggest that Hardy is an exponent of multivocality in literature. To do this, several scenes from Tess of the d’Urbervilles are analysed as a case study, in order to elucidate implications of which Hardy’s philosophical standpoints are presuppositions for the book. It is stressed that hybrid stylization charged with multivocality, which is bitingly effective in Hardy’s art, serves to undermine the alleged homogeneity of Kantian apodictic abstraction against which he guards. Hardy is highly averse to monothetic ideas, so much so that his book, with the hope of opening up a single authority and power to dialogic discussions, shows a marked concern with facilitating contact with what is belittled or suppressed by any dominant voice. So, in brief conclusion, it is underlined that by maximising this dialogic, democratic spirit, Hardy’s book manifests itself as one of the greatest works of art.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0