메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김채은 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국현대언어학회 언어연구 언어연구 제31권 제3호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
583 - 604 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Kim, Chae-Eun. 2015. Processing Subject and Indirect Object Relative Clauses. The Journal of Studies in Language 31.3, 583-604. This study examines whether native speakers of English process relative clauses in the order predicted by Keenan and Comrie’s (1977) Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy (NPAH) hypothesis and its application in sentence processing. This study compared both comprehension accuracy and total reading times in subject and indirect object relative clauses. Both subject and indirect object relatives typically take animate heads. Thus, the study had a purer test of the effect of the length of the filler-gap dependency controlling the animacy factor of the heads. Data were collected from forty-two adult speakers, using a self-paced reading task. The results of this study suggest that although comprehension score showed no difference between two types of relative clauses, sentences with indirect object relatives were more difficult to process than subject relatives, and this difficulty increased in the relative clause regions and the main verb region because readers spent more time in reading sentences with indirect relatives than with subject relatives. The evidence that was gathered here demonstrates that subject relatives are less complex than indirect object relatives in English, similar to the results in the literature for the similar constructions (i.e. comparison subject relatives vs. object relatives) in other languages. The results support the length of the filler-gap dependency demonstrating that dependencies have more difficult computation in indirect object relatives than in subject relatives because of the lexical material between the filler and the gap. (Korea University)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0