메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Keun Young Shin (Chonnam National University)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제44권 제4호
발행연도
2019.12
수록면
807 - 829 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Previous experimental studies showed that object-extracted relative clauses were easier to process than subject-extracted relative clauses when their embedded NPs were pronouns that typically refer to discourse-old topics. However, Reali & Christiansen (2007) found that this was not the case when an embedded pronoun is the inanimate singular pronoun it. This paper argues that the result of Reali & Christiansen’s experiment is partly due to embedded noun animacy, which strongly correlates with topicality. A fine-grained corpus study is conducted to show that embedded NPs are highly likely to be inanimate descriptive NPs headed by common nouns in subject-extracted relative clauses, whereas in object-extracted relative clauses the embedded NPs tend to be animate pronouns or proper nouns. Following the claim that the statistical biases observed in corpora have explanatory power for the processing difficulties of relative clauses, these contrasting distributional patterns suggest that the processing difficulty or easiness of object-extracted relative clauses depends on whether embedded NPs are unmarked for subjects in terms of animacy and topicality. It is thus argued that the processing difficulty of object-extracted relative clauses with inanimate pronouns, compared to those with animate pronouns, should be explained in terms of the degree of subjecthood of embedded NPs.

목차

1. Introduction
2. The pronominal effect on RC processing
3. Corpus study
4. General discussion
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0