메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이연식 (서울시립대학교)
저널정보
한일민족문제학회 韓日民族問題硏究 韓日民族問題硏究 제31호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
137 - 187 (51page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After World WarⅡ, 6.3~7.0 million japanese 2.5 million koreans repatriated to their own homeland. They had no right to select their residence, and lost one's private assets by the USAMGIK and Soviet Army's repatriate policy. After they went back to their homeland, they relied on social relief system, but it was not enough to satisfy all the repatriates because of deficient budget and goods. Especially, japanese repatriates had a tenacity for their lost-assets because japanese relief system was worse than they thought before, and the social treatment was so cold. In 1952, Japanese government abandoned the assets the repatriates had in old-colonies for the San-francisco Peace Treaty. Just after that, repatriates made a big movement demanding compensation toward japanese government. Being Confused, japanese government made a law called “Hikiagesha kyuhukin nadono shikyuuho” in order to soothe repatriates' rage. But it was impossible to lessen their dissatisfaction, to the contrary, the suit case for compensation made by repatriates increased. For that reason, japanese government made an additional law called “Hikiagesha Tokubetsukyuhukin sikyu ni taisuru ho” to terminate the trouble with repatriates, and gave some money to them. But that money means governmental responsibility for compensation, it was just an reward for poor life. The korean repatriates underwent similar experience to japanese who went back to their homeland. Their settlement circumstances was worse than japanese. They became so-called borderline class, failed to make their own political strength to draw some supports from USAMGIK. Unfortunately, they faced Korean War during 1950-1953. Thus korean repatriates had no chance to demand supports for better life. Even though some of the koreans received some money in 1974 when the laws of compensation for people who had been mobilized and sent to foreign areas as a soldier by japanese government general. But the laws limited qualification of receiver, who is the family member of the passed away. Therefore, so many victims like a comfort women or laborer hired in military plants had no chance to apply for the legal supports. After democratization of 1990's they began to demand revision of the support law. And since the 2000s some issues related to unsettled past affairs and Korea-Japan Treaty documents were raised, finally some laws for mobilized victims have come to be made. These support laws in korea and japan were made for domestic use. That's why it was impossible to bring japanese government account for responsibility. It made the old japanese colonial settlers, who had been harm-doer in colony, as new victims of war.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0