지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper we propose that how come is not a head C, but a maximal projection (MP) occupying CP-Spec and that differences of why and how come result from the difference in the base-generated position of the two wh-phrases. Under the framework of the articulated CP structure, it is suggested that why is base-generated in RP-Spec and moves to IntP-Spec, while how come is based-generated in IntP-Spec without any movement. This paper has shown that all the syntactic differences of why and how come are naturally accounted for by the difference in merge position of the two wh-phrases even though both of them are MPs occupying IntP-Spec. Finally, we propose that the lack of SAI in how come questions can be accounted for by considering how how come was generated. Since, how come is derived by verb movement into C in the early modern English period, the generation of how come already includes the process of SAI, making it not necessary any more.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
김연승 / 2013 / 의문사 'why’의 병합위치와 이동분석 / 생성문법연구 23(4):823~843
김연승 / 2016 / 영어의 다중슬루싱에 관한 연구 / 언어연구 31(4):841~861
Adger, D. / 2003 / Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach / Oxford University Press
Aoun, J. / 1993 / WH-elements in Situ: Syntax or LF? / Linguistic Inquiry 24:199~238
Baker, C. L / 1970 / Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme / Foundations of Language 6:197~219
김연승 / 2016 / 영어의 다중슬루싱에 관한 연구 / 언어연구 31(4):841~861
Adger, D. / 2003 / Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach / Oxford University Press
Aoun, J. / 1993 / WH-elements in Situ: Syntax or LF? / Linguistic Inquiry 24:199~238
Baker, C. L / 1970 / Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme / Foundations of Language 6:197~219
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0