지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to find out the syntactic structure where some syntactic peculiarities of interrogative why can be uniformly accounted for. Within the left periphery merge theory that why is base-generated in the left periphery of a clause, there are two options.
One is the non-movement analysis that why never moves in the complementizer layer. The other is the movement analysis that why moves within the complementizer layer(i.e., from RP-Spec to IntP-Spec).
On the basis of some pieces of empirical evidence, I have tried to illustrate that the movement analysis is more adequate than the non-movement analysis. I have shown that we cannot but adopt the movement analysis to uniformly account for the interaction of why with a quantifier or a focus operator, and some peculiar characteristics of why in multiple wh-questions.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
Aoun, J. / 1993 / WH-elements in situ: Syntax or LF? / Linguistic Inquiry 24 : 199 ~ 238
Baker, C. L. / 1970 / Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme / Foundations of Language 6 : 197 ~ 219
Chomsky, N. / 2000 / Minimalist inquiries, In Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik / MIT Press : 89 ~ 155
Chomsky, N. / 2001 / Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in language / MIT Press : 1 ~ 52
Collins, C. / 1991 / Why and how come, In Papers on wh-movement : 31 ~ 45
Baker, C. L. / 1970 / Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme / Foundations of Language 6 : 197 ~ 219
Chomsky, N. / 2000 / Minimalist inquiries, In Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik / MIT Press : 89 ~ 155
Chomsky, N. / 2001 / Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in language / MIT Press : 1 ~ 52
Collins, C. / 1991 / Why and how come, In Papers on wh-movement : 31 ~ 45
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0