메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김지홍 (경상대학교)
저널정보
한국방언학회 방언학 방언학 제26호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
229 - 260 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There have been observed (and listed) a plenty of non-canonical endings in Jeju Korean without any explanation. This paper claims that they be ascribed at least to three systems; firstly, derived endings through truncation process (table 4), secondly, amalgamated forms adopting nominal constructions (table 5) and, lastly, merged construction of two final endings (table 6) in terms of their intrinsic characteristics. All of them, needless to say, deserve the frame to classify canonical or typical endings with registers and moods (table 1) which fact implies they are no more idiosyncratic at all. All the morphemes used and the way to transfer relevant functions to target forms are typically Korean rudimentary elements (all the same but different applications). It is presumed that these non-canonical forms must be superior to canonical ending in daily informal conversation style. Once their distribution is fully proved with ‘big data’ support, they never be secondary status at all, regardless of later development. This means that both must have been necessarily required to fulfill pragmatic uses in daily lives. The derived forms of non-canonical endings (table 4) can be explained with omission phenomena pragmatically in which interlocutors share the context in common. Although the second form of nominal constructions (table 5) needs further research to interpretate, the vacant ‘N/A’ columns allow us to read ‘formative noun forms’ and other two forms as complimentary in way of composite features such as [± publicity, ± formality]. It requires modality to be expanded to cover endings with nominal construction, because only small number of special formative nouns are adopted. The last form (table 6) keeps some principle to have the only host ‘-ə’ (-어) which form is the default ending without any content added in spoken Korean. The fused form of consecutive endings is parallel to the so-called ‘emphatic’ constructions with ‘it~ that ~’ in English whose overall function asks more attention from hearer primarily. This may explain why there is no application in imperative mode except declaration and interrogation in table 6. A full description on Jeju Korean endings and its systematic explanation in Kim (2014 and 2016) says that all the grammatical forms used are Korean but uniquely different applications.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0