지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.1
- 수록면
- 180 - 189 (10page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Based on a survey of Korean waste-to-energy (WTE) firms, this article analyzes the R&D effectiveness of the WTEindustry, which accounts for the largest proportion of new and renewable energy power generation in Korea, using multipleand logistic regression. A company’s R&D can be considered effective if its R&D inputs (e.g., R&D expenditure/sales,R&D manpower/employees, education/training, and reward systems) or R&D outputs (e.g., patent applications andapprovals, the introduction of new products and services, and the redesign of products and processes) contribute to anincrease in R&D outcomes (e.g., decrease in production costs, the creation of employment, and market entry). It wasfound that market entry is not affected by R&D inputs but is positively influenced by R&D outputs, indicating that KoreanWTE firms have focused on market entry via the technology transfer of new products and services and/or the redesignof products and processes. In the WTE industry, the creation of employment does not have a statistically significantrelationship with R&D expenditure/sales, R&D manpower/employees, or the redesign of products, but it does exhibit apositive relationship with education/training, reward systems, patent applications and approvals, and the introduction of newproducts and services. Finally, the decrease in production costs is not influenced by R&D expenditure/sales, R&Dmanpower/employees, reward systems, or patent applications and approvals, but is positively affected by education/training,the introduction of new products and services, and the redesign of products and processes. A policy implication of theseresults is that market entry show the virtual cycle on expanding R&D expenditure/sales and/or R&D manpower/employees.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
Korea Energy Economics Institute / 2016 / World energy market insight 16(3)
The Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies / 2015 / The science & technology 550:17~21
Park, J. Y. / 2017 / Factors to evaluate the feasibility of the new and renewable energy generation business / Seoul Credit Ration Inc.
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade / 2013 / A study for revitalizing network and building value chain of the waste-to-energy Industry
Lieberman, M. / 1988 / First-mover advantages / Strategic Management Journal 9(1):41~58
The Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies / 2015 / The science & technology 550:17~21
Park, J. Y. / 2017 / Factors to evaluate the feasibility of the new and renewable energy generation business / Seoul Credit Ration Inc.
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade / 2013 / A study for revitalizing network and building value chain of the waste-to-energy Industry
Lieberman, M. / 1988 / First-mover advantages / Strategic Management Journal 9(1):41~58
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 폐자원에너지 산업의 R&D 효율성과 영향요인 분석
한국폐기물자원순환학회지
2017 .01
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .07
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2023 .11
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2020 .05
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2020 .04
-
Q&A
건축구조
2015 .01
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2020 .09
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .09
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .05
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2020 .07
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .03
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2020 .01
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .01
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2020 .11
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .11
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .09
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .11
-
씨앤에치아이앤씨(주)
대한토목학회지
2021 .12
-
Q & A
콘크리트학회지
2021 .03
-
Q&A
콘크리트학회지
2022 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0