Routine double-J stenting for live related donor kidney transplant recipients: It doesn't serve the purpose, but does it serve a better purpose?

Vikash Kumar; Chirag B Punatar; Kunal K Jadhav; Jatin Kothari; Vinod S Joshi; Sharad N Sagade; Madhav H Kamat

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Vikash Kumar (Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) Chirag B Punatar (Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) Kunal K Jadhav (Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) Jatin Kothari (Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) Vinod S Joshi (Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) Sharad N Sagade (Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) Madhav H Kamat (Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre)

저널정보: 대한비뇨기과학회 Investigative and Clinical Urology Investigative and Clinical Urology Vol.59 No.6

발행연도: 2018.1

수록면: 410 - 415 (6page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Purpose: Despite meticulous techniques, surgical complications continue to be problematic in kidney transplant recipients. Role of routine stenting to reduce complications is controversial. In this study, we compare incidence of early urological complications, lymphoceles, urinary tract infections (UTI) and graft function; with or without double-J stenting. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent live related donor renal transplantation from February 2014 to February 2016 were included. Transplants prior to February 2015 were without routine stenting; subsequent transplants were with routine stenting. Patients with neurogenic bladder, previously operated bladder and delayed or low urinary output were excluded. Follow-up was for at least three months. Descriptive statistics was performed for all parameters. Chi square test and Fisher's Exact test were used for qualitative variables. For quantitative variables, Mann-Whitney test was used to test median difference and independent samples t-test for mean difference. The p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: We analysed 74 patients (34 stented and 40 non-stented). There was no difference in the incidence of urinary leak, anastomotic obstruction, lymphoceles or UTI (p>0.4 for all comparisons). However, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at sixth day, 14th day, one month and two months were 76.1 vs. 61.5 (p=0.025), 72.1 vs. 56.6 (p=0.005), 79.4 vs. 63.1 (p=0.002) and 82.0 vs. 63.3 (p=0.001) in the stented versus non-stented groups. Conclusions: Placement of ureteral stent in renal transplant does not significantly affect the incidence of early urinary complications or UTI. However, graft function is significantly better in stented recipients, at least in the short term.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!