메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Development of Evaluation Criteria of Accreditation Standards for Occupational Therapy Education in Korea
Recommendations
Search

한국작업치료인증기준 평가항목 개발

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Lee Hyang Sook (대전보건대학교) 강대혁 (한서대학교) Moonyoung Chang (인제대학교) 우희순 (원광대학교) Song Jae Cheol (마산대학교) 정병록 (상지영서대학교) 박경영 (중원대학교) Jeongweon Lee (여주대학교) JeongKi Kim (대구보건대학교) 차유진 (세명대학교)
Journal
대한작업치료학회 대한작업치료학회지 대한작업치료학회지 제25권 제1호 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2017.1
Pages
123 - 137 (15page)

Usage

cover
Development of Evaluation Criteria of Accreditation Standards for Occupational Therapy Education in Korea
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Objective : The aim of this study was to develop evaluation criteria for the accreditation standards of occupational therapy education in Korea. Methods : Faculty members were surveyed regarding the validity of the evaluation criteria from June to August, 2016. Six categories were developed through a literature review, and the validity of each item was measured on a four-point scale. 84 responses were received and analyzed. Through focus group meetings, the results were reviewed, and the core competency categories and items of occupational therapy were revised. The final evaluation criteria were completed, and their content validity was assessed by ten occupational therapy education experts. Results : The final evaluation criteria consisted of six categories, 15 items, and 31 sub-items. The mean validity of the items ranged from 3.3 to 4, and the final Content Validity Index (CVI) was between 0.8 and 1. The core work competency of occupational therapy was classified into interview/evaluation and intervention/others, and the mean validity of the sub-categories ranged from 3.0 to 3.6, with a CVI of 1. Actual testing was preferred for assessing the core work competency of both interview/evaluation (40.6%) and intervention/others (37.5%). Conclusion : The establishment and application of evaluation criteria for occupational therapy education will facilitate the accomplishment of public responsibility and international recognition.

Contents

No content found

References (21)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.