메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
보해니안 (조선대학교)
저널정보
조선대학교 법학연구원 법학논총 법학논총 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
205 - 268 (64page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
South Korean President, Moon Jae-in is honorably following up on his campaign promises, reiterating his strong commitment to “first meet the needs of the people.” In January, 2018, President Moon called for a national referendum on constitutional revision, in the meantime urging lawmakers in the Korean National Assembly to accelerate deliberation on potential constitutional amendments to enhance human rights and move to decentralize government in Korea. Among the more important issues in the resulting constitutional debate is the nature and scope of effective checks and balances on the powers of the nation’s Chief Executive. It is common knowledge that Korea has enjoyed a profound and healthy overall trend of social and economic development since 1987. In order to maintain the impetus of this positive growth, this paper suggests that in lieu of making dramatic and possibly ineffective constitution amendments relying solely on the doctrine of separation of powers, which is class neutral and blind to economic interests, scholars and reformers also consider the implications of the classical theory of mixed government. Although the practical impact of mixed government ostensibly died along with the demise of monarchy, giving birth to the Federalists’ formulation of the separation of powers, the theory of mixed government still endures in thoughtful minds because it takes into consideration how alignment in class and economic interests impacts the distribution and consolidation of political power. This piece outlines the history of democratic development in Korea; reviews the separation of powers principle and the liberal view of self-government; briefly surveys typical theoretical responses to liberalism; resurrects the theory of mixed government; argues for the class consciousness that is embedded in the anacyclosis of Polybius; and concludes with a recommendation that Korean scholars reconsider the utility of the classical theory of mixed government to formulate a republican polity that maintains the healthy balance of social and economic development that has characterized the Korean democratic movement since its inception. In substance, the term democracy is modern shorthand for mixed government, which may best function today in a healthy republic through the independence of the chief executive (representing the interests of all citizens alike with no particular regional or class preferences) and the equal vigilance of a citizenry that is intimately involved in government at the local and national levels. Much additional reflection and deliberation is required, and this paper is only an initial inquiry.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (54)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0