지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Nearly 30 years ago, a gesture of reconciliation was provided by international relations to international law after the long period of mutual neglect. Despite sharing the big picture of “international”, international law and international relations have been fighting each other to win recognition in the international society as the disicpline better suited to international affairs. Because the explanatory power of international relations tends to be more easily understood by the international society than the normative power of international law, this battle seems to be favorable to international relations. During the interwar period, international law is regarded as a toothless tiger for its incapability to maintain international peace and security due to its obsession with the normative approach based on legal positivism. However, after the bridge between international law and international relations is built, the possibility of international law to maintain international peace and security is emphasized by various interdisciplinary researches mainly driven from international relations. In this context, the resurrection of international law’s importance is actually owed to the robust contribution of international relations. At first glance, the marriage between international law and international relations is likely to last a long time because they have “international” in common with. However, the strong request for velvet divorce has been made from international law because the balance between international law and international relations is severely broken. Under the name of interdisciplinary researches, international law is endangered to be a peripheral discipline because international relations has an seemingly disrespectful attitude towards international law based on instrumentalism. Since international relations defines international law as the tool for realizing the interest of powerful States, international law is on the verge of losing its core nature that represents the legal praxis in the international society. In this context, there has been a growing voice that international law should find its right place. This movement is strongly supported by the argument of counter-disciplinarity. It is hardly possible to expect the final scene on the battle between interdisciplinarity and counter-disciplinarity because each camp has its own merits and demerits as a discipline of international affairs. In this sense, a third way is needed to conduct a true interdisciplinary research on international law and international relations. Just combining international law with international relations does not make a substantial contribution to interdisciplinarity. Counter-disciplinarity also has a strong tendency to exaggerate the dark side of the interrelationship between international law and international relations. In this context, an epistemic community would be needed for paving the new way for vitalizing interdisciplinarity. Without prejudice to the nature of respective disciplines, an epistemic community with shared issue areas could make a huge contribution to interdisciplinarity between international law and international relations in true sense. It would be interesting to predict how an epistemic community will overcome various challenges from both interdisciplinarity and counter-disciplinarity.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Future of International Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
China, Cultural Heritage, and International Law (Routledge Research in International Law)
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
-
国際法理論としての政治的現実主義の視座 -国際関係論･国際法の架橋という図式を超えて-
차세대 인문사회연구
2018 .01
-
국제가사사건을 다루는 법률가들께 드리는 고언(苦言)
가족법연구
2016 .03
-
국제법학과 국제관계학의 학제 간 연구에 관한 고찰
법학연구
2021 .01
-
The Changing Structure and Paradigm Shift in International Law
국제법학회논총
2018 .12
-
시민민주주의와 보편적 법체계의 발전: 헌법과 국제법을 대체하는 세계법의 수사학
법학논총
2024 .08
-
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN KOREA : MEASURING UP TO INTERNATIONAL LAW?
저스티스
2019 .02
-
The Protection of Intellectual property in International Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
Paradigms of International Human Rights Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
Intellectual Property and Private International Law
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
The International Law of Biotechnology: Human Rights, Trade, Patents, Health and the Environment (Principles of International Law series)
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
-
International Intellectual Property Law : Cases and Materials
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
국제사법의 역사적 발전과 세계화 시대의 법리 - 법률관계의 구조변화와 Savigny 이론의 재정립 -
법학연구
2021 .11
-
Cybersecurity and International Law
국제법평론
2015 .01
-
코로나19와 국제법
인권과 정의
2020 .01
-
The Character of the Korean Trade Law: The Multi-Layered Structure and New Function of the Law
무역연구
2020 .01
-
「무역상무연구」 국제경제 및 국제경영 분야 메타분석
무역상무연구
2023 .12
-
지식재산과 국제사법에 관한 ILA 가이드라인
국제사법연구
2021 .06
-
Balancing Human Rights, Environmental Protection and International Trade: Lessons from the EU Experience (Studies in International Trade and Investment Law)
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0