지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 169 (169page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to review the policies and directions of support, establishing data on the status of the Released Improvement Zones in Gyeonggi-do and categorizing them according to regional characteristics to make types of each zone. And this also provides policy proposals to support the Urban Regeneration Projects with the way of improvement of the propulsion system and each step’s implementation.
First, investigating the context of cancelation of each Released Improvement Zone and setting its current physical and social data on 31 cities(“Si”) and counties(“Gun”) has done. After examination of the residential and commercial functions to distinguish the types of zones, here conducts the analysis, following the requirements of “Urban Improvement Project” and “Urban Regeneration Project” from the ACT ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF URBAN AREAS AND RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS and the SPECIAL ACT ON PROMOTION OF AND SUPPORT FOR URBAN REGENERATION.
A total of 307 is where the Released Improvement Zones are, and the only 48 zones are now trying “Urban Regeneration” with 19 projects. Thus the analysis is conducted according to the criteria of each type, divided into five types: Residential-focused regeneration(type1), Urban improvement(Urban Renewal) type(type2), Commercial regeneration centered on a metropolitan-regional scale(type3), alley-oriented commercial regeneration on town scale(type4) and inappropriate type to urban regeneration projects as the failure to meet the project’s requirements(type5).
As a result of the analysis, type 5 is revealed with 77 zones, and the other 182 zones showed that they could go with the Urban Regeneration Projects. Furthermore, among those potential zones with the projects, the residential-focused type(type 1 and 2) has 69 zones, and the commercial regeneration centered type belongs with 113 zones.
Proposing everyday policies to the types, type 1 needs to promote the “Urban Regeneration New Deal Projects” as the residential-focused regeneration and the “Housing Repair Support Projects” for the direct impact on the residents. New house on each lot level such as an “Autonomous Housing Improvement Project” is also recommended with the upgrade of life-friendly infra system.
Type 2 is a type of Urban Improvement Project that is possible and can also carry out with the small scale improvement project to secure daily infra-structures at least, following the residents’ reaction.
For the commercial regeneration centered on a metropolitan and regional scale, Type 3 can associate the Urban Regeneration Projects with the Commercial Area Revitalization Project by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, and also with the support policies on Commercial Promoted Zones by Gyeonggi-do.
As a neighborhood commercial district(an alley level), when promoting urban regeneration projects, registration of alley-type shopping districts can go along together.
Lastly, type 5 doesn’t meet the requirement of The standards for gauging the decline of cities and standards for diagnosis thereof in a SPECIAL ACT ON PROMOTION OF AND SUPPORT FOR URBAN REGENERATION, so the urban regeneration project is not feasible. Since the area has mostly commercial zones which once designated for urban environment improvement projects, there are many zones which have subject to mitigation provisions under a SPECIAL ACT ON THE PROMOTION OF URBAN RENEWAL.
To promote each type with the conclusion of this study, a review of Gyeonggi-do"s support projects to strengthen people’s capabilities is recommended, as there is a number of zones where the residents" consultative body has not been formed yet in the Released Improvement Zones. So the existed support for the formulation of a plan for the Customized Improvement Projects from Gyeonggi-do will be expanded and reorganized into the Enhancement Projects for capability.
In addition, the final proposal is to establish an inter-departmental cooperative system and to promote the urban regeneration pilot project linked to an alley-type shopping district.
First, investigating the context of cancelation of each Released Improvement Zone and setting its current physical and social data on 31 cities(“Si”) and counties(“Gun”) has done. After examination of the residential and commercial functions to distinguish the types of zones, here conducts the analysis, following the requirements of “Urban Improvement Project” and “Urban Regeneration Project” from the ACT ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF URBAN AREAS AND RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS and the SPECIAL ACT ON PROMOTION OF AND SUPPORT FOR URBAN REGENERATION.
A total of 307 is where the Released Improvement Zones are, and the only 48 zones are now trying “Urban Regeneration” with 19 projects. Thus the analysis is conducted according to the criteria of each type, divided into five types: Residential-focused regeneration(type1), Urban improvement(Urban Renewal) type(type2), Commercial regeneration centered on a metropolitan-regional scale(type3), alley-oriented commercial regeneration on town scale(type4) and inappropriate type to urban regeneration projects as the failure to meet the project’s requirements(type5).
As a result of the analysis, type 5 is revealed with 77 zones, and the other 182 zones showed that they could go with the Urban Regeneration Projects. Furthermore, among those potential zones with the projects, the residential-focused type(type 1 and 2) has 69 zones, and the commercial regeneration centered type belongs with 113 zones.
Proposing everyday policies to the types, type 1 needs to promote the “Urban Regeneration New Deal Projects” as the residential-focused regeneration and the “Housing Repair Support Projects” for the direct impact on the residents. New house on each lot level such as an “Autonomous Housing Improvement Project” is also recommended with the upgrade of life-friendly infra system.
Type 2 is a type of Urban Improvement Project that is possible and can also carry out with the small scale improvement project to secure daily infra-structures at least, following the residents’ reaction.
For the commercial regeneration centered on a metropolitan and regional scale, Type 3 can associate the Urban Regeneration Projects with the Commercial Area Revitalization Project by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, and also with the support policies on Commercial Promoted Zones by Gyeonggi-do.
As a neighborhood commercial district(an alley level), when promoting urban regeneration projects, registration of alley-type shopping districts can go along together.
Lastly, type 5 doesn’t meet the requirement of The standards for gauging the decline of cities and standards for diagnosis thereof in a SPECIAL ACT ON PROMOTION OF AND SUPPORT FOR URBAN REGENERATION, so the urban regeneration project is not feasible. Since the area has mostly commercial zones which once designated for urban environment improvement projects, there are many zones which have subject to mitigation provisions under a SPECIAL ACT ON THE PROMOTION OF URBAN RENEWAL.
To promote each type with the conclusion of this study, a review of Gyeonggi-do"s support projects to strengthen people’s capabilities is recommended, as there is a number of zones where the residents" consultative body has not been formed yet in the Released Improvement Zones. So the existed support for the formulation of a plan for the Customized Improvement Projects from Gyeonggi-do will be expanded and reorganized into the Enhancement Projects for capability.
In addition, the final proposal is to establish an inter-departmental cooperative system and to promote the urban regeneration pilot project linked to an alley-type shopping district.
목차
[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
[제2장 법·제도 검토]
1. 관련 법 현황
2. 관련 정책 현황
[제3장 경기도 도시재생·정비사업 현황]
1. 원도심 쇠퇴 현황
2. 도시재생 및 정비사업 현황
3. 도시정비 해제구역 내 사업 현황
[제4장 도시정비사업 해제구역의 특성 및 정책방향]
1. 일반현황
2. 해제구역 유형별 특성
3. 해제구역 유형별 정책방향
[제5장 결론 및 정책제안]
1. 연구의 요약
2. 정책제안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지방 소도시 도시재생사업 추진방안 연구
주거환경
2023 .09
-
도시재생사업 유형화를 통한 도시재생활성화계획의 계획적 적합성 연구: 서울시 27개소 활성화지역을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2020 .11
-
창원시 도시재생사업의 평가지표 설정에 관한 연구 : 선도지역사업을 중심으로
주거환경
2018 .12
-
경기도 맞춤형 생활환경 개선사업 지원 방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .11
-
도시재생 선도지역의 사업유형 및 재원조달 특성 분석 : 도시재생 활성화계획(안)을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2016 .06
-
도시재생 정책의 흐름과 실현에 관한 연구
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2021 .11
-
AHP기법을 이용한 도시재생사업의 우선순위 평가 : 창원(마산)시를 중심으로
주거환경
2016 .12
-
도시재생활성화계획의 사업추진전략 특성에 관한 연구 : 부산시 내 도시재생사업을 중심으로
도시재생
2023 .04
-
상권재생 전략 도출을 위한 요인분석 연구 : 창원(마산)시 도시재생사업지를 중심으로
주거환경
2017 .06
-
IPA를 활용한 도시재생 뉴딜사업 성과평가 - 강원도를 중심으로 -
주거환경
2021 .12
-
도시재생사업의 전·후 비교분석 - 13개 도시재생 선도지역 대상으로 -
부동산정책연구
2019 .01
-
The Role of Public Developer in Urban Regeneration Projects
토지주택연구
2017 .04
-
주거지재생을 위한 근린재생형 활성화계획의 개선방향 연구
주택도시연구
2018 .12
-
도시재생사업의 지속가능성을 위한 재원조달 방안 연구: 지역리츠제 도입을 중심으로
도시재생
2021 .01
-
텍스트마이닝을 활용한 정비사업과 도시재생사업의 사회적 인식 차이에 관한 분석
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2021 .11
-
도시재생사업 성과분석 및 스마트도시재생 평가지표 연구 - 경남 창원시 · 진주시 · 남해군 사업지구를 중심으로 -
주거환경
2022 .12
-
이직의사 영향요인 분석을 통한 도시재생지원센터 운영여건 개선방안
도시재생
2021 .12
-
근린지역 도시재생 정책요인의 한ㆍ미간 비교ㆍ고찰
한국지역개발학회지
2015 .12
-
도시정비법 전부개정과 제도개선의 제언
건설법연구
2019 .03
-
스마트기술을 활용한 도시재생사업 운영⋅관리 실태 분석
도시정책연구
2022 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-309-000053352