지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.1
- 수록면
- 539 - 560 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study analyzes American defense and security strategy towards China and assesses its policy impact on security on the Korean Peninsula and the Asia?Pacific region more generally. The rapid rise of the People’s Republic of China as a geopolitical power and its aggressive foreign policy has considerably heightened fears among U.S. policymakers that China poses a threat. The intensifying strategic rivalry and distrust between Washington and Beijing since the inauguration of President Donald J. Trump in 2017 is leading to worsened relations between the two countries. This trend is likely to continue in the foreseeable future, and it is also expected that the American grand strategy will view China as the new global adversary, drawing down the “War on Terror” in the process. China is indeed fast emerging as the target of sustained deterrence, and this shift in American strategic thinking will likely continue even after the 2020 U.S. Presidential elections. Intensifying Sino?American geopolitical competition is resulting in a new Cold War posture, reflecting in turn a lack of strategic dialogue. As a result, the risk of Sino?American military conflict in geopolitical hotspots around the world (including the Korean Peninsula) is rapidly increasing, and countries in the region are worried about being entangled in a Great Power conflict between the two countries. In the meantime, the United States is soliciting countries in the region to join an “anti- Beijing” grouping of sorts, seeking to integrate pre-existing alliances (e.g., the ROK?U.S. Alliance) into this new grouping. Beijing, for its part, is attempting to weaken those traditional alliances with Washington, through measures such as economic coercion. Seoul is bearing the brunt of such sustained pressure from Beijing and is being pressured by both countries to “pick” one side over the other. Practically speaking, rather than pick sides, Seoul ought to chart a middle course, proceeding with “strategic confidence” that draws on a clear delineation of national interest and backing of the South Korean public. In particular, it would behoove Seoul to provide opportunities for deliberation on Korean Peninsula security issues, enhancing the prospects for meaningful strategic dialogue between Washington and Beijing. Concurrently, Seoul would also benefit from vigilant monitoring of the changing balance of power between United States and China, utilizing insights drawn from keen monitoring to further enhance its defense capabilities. In so doing, it is expected that Seoul will enhance its strategic value and military deterrence capabilities. Concurrently, by way of proactive military-to-military diplomatic engagement with neighboring countries, cooperative deterrence capabilities also would have to be significantly enhanced.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (60)
참고문헌 신청
John J. Mearsheimer / 2017 / Tragedy of Great Power Politics / Kim and Kim Books :24
W-S Cho / 2014 / Theories of U.S.–China Relations / Seoul National University Press :75~132
Kurt M. Campbell / 2016 / The Pivot: The Future of American Statecraft in Asia / Twelve Hachette Book Group
John J. Mearsheimer / 2018 / The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities / Yale University Press
Stephen M. Walt / 2018 / The Hell of Good Intentions:America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy / Farrar, Straus and Girous
W-S Cho / 2014 / Theories of U.S.–China Relations / Seoul National University Press :75~132
Kurt M. Campbell / 2016 / The Pivot: The Future of American Statecraft in Asia / Twelve Hachette Book Group
John J. Mearsheimer / 2018 / The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities / Yale University Press
Stephen M. Walt / 2018 / The Hell of Good Intentions:America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy / Farrar, Straus and Girous
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
South Korea’s China Policy, Evolving Sino–ROK Relations, and Their Implications for East Asian Security
Pacific Focus
2016 .01
-
중국 군사전략의 변화에 대한 분석
한국군사학논집
2021 .06
-
New Threat Perceptions, Domestic Political Changes and India’s Shifting Strategy toward the U.S.–China Rivalry
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2023 .05
-
중국의 대(對)주변국 군사 분쟁을 통해서 본 ‘적극방어’ 군사전략의 특징, 함의
군사
2018 .03
-
트럼프 행정부 인도·태평양 전략의 문제점과 향후 전망
한국군사학논총
2020 .01
-
Bolstering the Alliance for a Trilateralism?Based Security Strategy for South Korea in Times of US?China Rivalry*
Pacific Focus
2022 .04
-
Living among the Elephants: South Korea and Japan’s Response to the U.S.–China Maritime Rivalry in the Asia–Pacific
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
The Offensive Realists Are Not Wrong: China’s Growth and Aggression, 1976–2001
Pacific Focus
2017 .01
-
Китай и глобальное лидерство
분석과 대안
2017 .01
-
Northeast Asia Order after WWII: Continuity, Compliance, Power-Transition and Challenges
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2015 .01
-
Extended Deterrent Effect of China and Its Implications on the U.S.-N. Korean Nuclear Negotiation
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2020 .01
-
China's Great Power Identity and Its Policy on the Korean Peninsula in the Xi Jinping Era
Pacific Focus
2018 .01
-
미-중 무역 분쟁의 원인과 주요 변수에 관한 연구
한중사회과학연구
2018 .01
-
중국군의 지정학적 역할 확대와 지역안보
한국군사학논집
2018 .06
-
G2체제에서 중국의 군사전략 변화양상 분석
대한정치학회보
2017 .01
-
A New Cold War? U.S. Strategic Transitions and China’s Diplomatic Turnovers Amid Escalating Bilateral Tensions
Journal of China Studies
2022 .09
-
Regional Security Order and South Korea–Japan Relations
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2022 .12
-
미래전과 자율무기체계의 미중경쟁과 한국
정치정보연구
2021 .06
-
ROK-US Cooperation in an Era of US-China Strategic Competition
EAI 이슈브리핑
2019 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0