메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김도완 (한성대학교)
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제17권 제2호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
359 - 374 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to confirm the tracking error of futures ETFs according to their portfolio weights with the most recent and next month’s maturity futures contracts. Design/Methodology/Approach This research used futures indexes, futures contracts, ETF prices, and net asset value data of ETFs from the Fn Data Guide. Tracking error of futures ETFs, volatility, spread rate, and weight error variables were calculated from the data, and panel regression models from Hausman (1978) were used for empirical analysis. Findings This research has two findings. First, the tracking error from D-3 (criterion: most recent maturity of futures contracts) to D-day (criterion: most recent maturity of futures contracts) was higher than the other trading days’ tracking errors. This is because the futures index is calculated with the most recent and next month’s maturity futures contracts, and the weight is different. Second, if the weight error between the most recent month’s maturity and next month’s maturity futures contracts is high in ETF portfolios, the tracking error is high. Research Implications The results from the empirical analysis are as follows. When portfolio managers in futures ETFs do not adjust the futures contract weights between the most recent month’s maturity and next month’s maturity exactly, the tracking error is high. Therefore, managers should reflect the weight of the portfolio exactly.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0