메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
공용구 (성균관대학교) 최경희 (성균관대학교) 심현호 (성균관대학교) 조민욱 (성균관대학교) 김민정 (성균관대학교) 박상수 (성균관대학교) 심진우 (성균관대학교) 김승연 (성균관대학교)
저널정보
대한인간공학회 대한인간공학회지 대한인간공학회지 제40권 제5호
발행연도
2021.10
수록면
313 - 329 (17page)
DOI
10.5143/JESK.2021.40.5.313

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop an assessment system for quantitatively comparing the workloads of manual care (MC) and robot-aid care (RC) of the care jobs.
Background: Due to the rapid aging of Korea, the demand for human resources for elderly care tasks has been rapidly increased. Caregivers taking care of the elderly have been under high physical and mental stress due to various types of care work. Recently, many care robots using the technology of the 4th Industrial Revolution have been proposed as a solution to reduce caregiver’s load. However, there is still insufficient research to evaluate the physical and mental load relief effects of caregivers through comprehensive assessment.
Method: The upper index (physical and mental loads) and the lower indexes of each upper index were determined through the literature survey and 42 ergonomic experts’ opinions. Ergonomics experts and caregivers also conducted the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine weights of the upper and lower indexes. Two task types (Bed to Chair and Chair to Bed) and two care types (Manual care and Robot-aid care) were performed to estimate the final work load scores based on the task types and care types in this study.
Results: The results of the AHP analysis showed that the physical load was higher than the mental load for elderly caring tasks. Muscle load was the highest work stress in the physical load, followed by subjective body and posture loads. Safety stress was the most in the mental load, followed by task-difficulty stress and emotional stress, respectively. Robot-aided care showed a lower final workload score, including physical and mental load scores, than manual care in both types of tasks (Bed to Chair, Chair to Bed).
Conclusion: A workload assessment system was developed by selecting assessment indexes of physical and mental loads that reflect the characteristics of transfer assistive care. It was noted that the physical and mental loads might be reduced in robot-aided care compared to manual care based on this study.
Application: The workload assessment system can be used to quantitatively evaluate the reduction of workloads for applying different types of manual care and robot-aided care systems in elderly care work.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (45)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-530-002166397