지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第156輯
- 발행연도
- 2021.9
- 수록면
- 193 - 246 (54page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2021.9.156.193
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1940, when France surrendered in Germany and the transition of World War II was greatly changed, the Japanese government tried to contributes to the victory of the German war through the Tripartite Pact, and to establish dominance to the whole East Asian region. The most important challenge for this was the solution of the Sino-Japanese War. Japan tried to keep Japan-China Basic Relations Treaty, and wanted to maintain political and economic dominance in the China continent after the end of the Sino-Japanese War. Meanwhile, the US government cooperated with the British, engaged in European battlefield to respond to the threat of Germany in the Atlantic Ocean, and they established a war plan to defeat Germany. In addition to Germany, the United States was prepared for the attacks of Japan, and established concurrent war performance plans over the Atlantic and Pacific, and shared it with the UK.
Japan-US relationships were deteriorated by Tripartite Pact, a Military Alliance for the purpose of attack America, and America’s selecting the support for China and the strengthening of economic sanctions against Japan. In such a situation, American and Japanese people who have felt a sense of crisis are promoted between the intergovernmental dialogue for the Japan and US, and such efforts made US-Japan appreciation document established and Japan-US negotiations start. The John Doe Associates, a semi-official and a semi-civillian organization wrote US-Japan appreciation document. It shows that Japan will reduce the possibility of attacking US by she interprets Triparite Pack more generously. In order to solve the Sino-Japanese war problem, the US Government will promise to cooperate Japanese government, so she can maintain paramount status in the continental China. Most of the Japanese government officials were satisfied with the document, but the Matsuoka Yosuke Foreign Minister, who thought the Tripartite Pact is critical for Japan’s future, denied this ‘give-and-take’ proposal.
Meanwhile, the bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs, thought that the expansion of Japan"s influence to Far East will infringe American national interests. And under the circumstance of World War II has broke out, they thought that it is possible that Japan launches additional military action to South East Asia.
For this reason, they opposed to accept the contents of US-Japan appreciation document by John Do Associates. They thought that US government should not recognize Japan’s control over the Chinese continent, and it can not deter Japan"s additional military advance for regions other than China. Therefore, the bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs refuse to the ‘give-and-take’ proposal which presented in the document, and they claimed that the Japanese army should be withdrawn from the Chinese territory completely, and that after the end of the Sino-Japanese War, Japan"s influence to the China should be limited.
As seen above, in the process of Japan-US negotiations that began through the establishment of US-Japan appreciation document, the most important issue on the surface was a solution for the Sino-Japanese War problem. However, considering the historical meaning of this problem, disagreement between Japan and the US are not limited to only China"s continental area, but the entire order of the entire East Asia after the World war was over. Japan"s intentions was advancing southward to attain natural resources and maintaining the influence on the Chinese continent after the war was end. But the bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs understood Japan’s intention as an invasive and predatory policy, so their conclusion was that the US gervernment should stop Japan’s invasive policy. The bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs, including Stanley Hornbeck, opposed for American gevernment to yield China issues, and tried to deter Japan’s military advance to southward, from day April 9, 1941, when US-Japan appreciation document has submitted, and they maintained their stance until the Pacific War broke out. We can understand such polical decisions as a purpose of trying to maximize the influence of the United States on the region by stabilizing the order of the entire Pacific coastal area, including the Far East region.
Japan-US relationships were deteriorated by Tripartite Pact, a Military Alliance for the purpose of attack America, and America’s selecting the support for China and the strengthening of economic sanctions against Japan. In such a situation, American and Japanese people who have felt a sense of crisis are promoted between the intergovernmental dialogue for the Japan and US, and such efforts made US-Japan appreciation document established and Japan-US negotiations start. The John Doe Associates, a semi-official and a semi-civillian organization wrote US-Japan appreciation document. It shows that Japan will reduce the possibility of attacking US by she interprets Triparite Pack more generously. In order to solve the Sino-Japanese war problem, the US Government will promise to cooperate Japanese government, so she can maintain paramount status in the continental China. Most of the Japanese government officials were satisfied with the document, but the Matsuoka Yosuke Foreign Minister, who thought the Tripartite Pact is critical for Japan’s future, denied this ‘give-and-take’ proposal.
Meanwhile, the bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs, thought that the expansion of Japan"s influence to Far East will infringe American national interests. And under the circumstance of World War II has broke out, they thought that it is possible that Japan launches additional military action to South East Asia.
For this reason, they opposed to accept the contents of US-Japan appreciation document by John Do Associates. They thought that US government should not recognize Japan’s control over the Chinese continent, and it can not deter Japan"s additional military advance for regions other than China. Therefore, the bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs refuse to the ‘give-and-take’ proposal which presented in the document, and they claimed that the Japanese army should be withdrawn from the Chinese territory completely, and that after the end of the Sino-Japanese War, Japan"s influence to the China should be limited.
As seen above, in the process of Japan-US negotiations that began through the establishment of US-Japan appreciation document, the most important issue on the surface was a solution for the Sino-Japanese War problem. However, considering the historical meaning of this problem, disagreement between Japan and the US are not limited to only China"s continental area, but the entire order of the entire East Asia after the World war was over. Japan"s intentions was advancing southward to attain natural resources and maintaining the influence on the Chinese continent after the war was end. But the bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs understood Japan’s intention as an invasive and predatory policy, so their conclusion was that the US gervernment should stop Japan’s invasive policy. The bureaucrats in the Division of Far Eastern Affairs, including Stanley Hornbeck, opposed for American gevernment to yield China issues, and tried to deter Japan’s military advance to southward, from day April 9, 1941, when US-Japan appreciation document has submitted, and they maintained their stance until the Pacific War broke out. We can understand such polical decisions as a purpose of trying to maximize the influence of the United States on the region by stabilizing the order of the entire Pacific coastal area, including the Far East region.
#미일 교섭
#Hull-Nomura Talk
#미일 양해안
#삼국 동맹 조약
#미국 국무부 극동국
#마쓰오카 요스케(松岡洋右) 외무대신
#스탠리 혼벡(Stanley K. Hornbeck)
#日米交渉
#日米諒解案
#三国同盟条約
#アメリカ国務省極東部
#松岡洋右外相
#スタンレー・ホーンベック
#Nomura-Hull Talk
#U.S.-Japan appreciation document
#Tripartite Pact
#U.S. Department of state
#Division of Far Eastern Affairs
#Minister of Foreign Affair Matsuoka Yosuke
#Stanley K. Hornbeck
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 일독이(日獨伊) 삼국 동맹 조약의 체결과 일화 기본 조약(日華基本條約)의 체결
Ⅱ. 미일 양해안(美日諒解案)의 성립과 일본 정부의 반응
Ⅲ. 미 국무부 극동국(極東局)의 대일 정책과 6월 안의 제시
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (60)
참고문헌 신청
Stanley Kuhl Hornbeck papers, in Hoover Institution / Stanford University
｢大陸指第六七六号掲示(桐工作) 昭和15年3月17日｣ JACAR (アジア歴史資料センター) Ref.C12120058650, 支那事変戦争指導関係綴 其の2 昭和13年1月～昭和17年11月 / 防衛省防衛研究所
｢日独伊同盟条約関係一件 第二巻 分割三｣ JACAR(アジア歴史資料センター) Ref.B04013490400, 日独伊同盟条約関係一件 第二巻(B-1-0-0-J/X3_002) / 外務省外交史料館
国立公文書館所蔵 ｢日満華共同宣言ヲ公布ス｣ 請求記号類02349100
日本国会図書館憲政資料室所 / 近衛文麿関係文書, マイクロフィルム･リール四
｢大陸指第六七六号掲示(桐工作) 昭和15年3月17日｣ JACAR (アジア歴史資料センター) Ref.C12120058650, 支那事変戦争指導関係綴 其の2 昭和13年1月～昭和17年11月 / 防衛省防衛研究所
｢日独伊同盟条約関係一件 第二巻 分割三｣ JACAR(アジア歴史資料センター) Ref.B04013490400, 日独伊同盟条約関係一件 第二巻(B-1-0-0-J/X3_002) / 外務省外交史料館
国立公文書館所蔵 ｢日満華共同宣言ヲ公布ス｣ 請求記号類02349100
日本国会図書館憲政資料室所 / 近衛文麿関係文書, マイクロフィルム･リール四
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
마쓰오카 요스케(松岡洋右) 외무대신의 전시(戰時) 외교 전략 - 대미 정책을 중심으로 -
人文科學硏究
2021 .08
-
18세기 후반 쓰시마 간사재판(幹事裁判)의 교섭 검토
한일관계사연구
2019 .11
-
『죽도도해일건기전(竹嶋渡海一件記全)』을 통해 본 도해와 밀무역 : 에도시대 상인 이마쓰야 하치에몬의 도해사업
일본문화학보
2018 .05
-
Stanley에 나타난 이성애적 가부장제 비판과 젠더 확장
현대영미드라마
2024 .08
-
TALK BACK
트래비 Travie
2024 .10
-
TALK BACK
트래비 Travie
2024 .08
-
TALK BACK
트래비 Travie
2025 .02
-
TALK BACK
트래비 Travie
2024 .12
-
TALK BACK
트래비 Travie
2025 .03
-
Talk Back
트래비 Travie
2024 .11
-
TALK BACK
트래비 Travie
2024 .09
-
「絵の鑑賞」による対話型日本語授業のデザイン
일어일문학
2017 .02
-
신라 집사부의 직무에 대한 재검토 - 집사부 성립기의 ‘기밀사무’를 중심으로 -
한국고대사연구
2024 .06
-
중국 민간고문서의 의미와 그 내용 분석 -明代 이후의 민간고문서를 중심으로-
전북사학
2023 .03
-
한일 역사 갈등의 變換과 역사교과서 敍事 構成의 변화(1945~2007)
역사교육
2024 .09
-
Korean Language Education in North America: Its State of Affairs and Beyond
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2024 .12
-
방촌 황희의 재상 리더십
한국철학논집
2023 .02
-
제6차 한일회담 시기의 문화재 반환 교섭 연구 : 교섭 과정과 그 의미를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2018 .06
-
일본으로 반출된 조선시대 고문서의 유형과 내용
국학연구
2022 .03
-
조선시대 두부의 문화사적 전개 및 제작·활용의 양상
한국민속학
2021 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0