지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to examine a series of events when North Korea, China, and the Soviet Union raised the allegation of "biological warfare" against the US and allies, and its inner story by comparing and analyzing documents, letters, memoirs recorded in Korea, China, Britain, the Soviet Union, and the US during the Korean War.
This article consists of two parts. The first part examines the process of raising the allegations mainly from 1951 to 1952. The allegations of biological warfare by the US. were first raised on May 8, 1951, when Park Heon-young, a foreign minister of North Korea, issued a statement charging the US of using biological weapons but there were no ensuing allegations after that time. In 1952, the large scale propaganda of the ‘biological warfare’ allegations occurred in cooperation with North Korea, China, and the Soviet Union. Three investigation teams were, supported by those countries, also established. The second one looks into ‘evidence’ provided by communist countries was highly likely to be fabricated. This fabrication was attested to in the memoir of a head of the Chinese Army"s sanitary department, Wu Zhi-ri, as also was reaffirmed in documents of the Soviet Union, implying that the origin of allegations was from China. This, however, does not necessarily mean that the allegations were entirely manipulated. China and the Soviet Union used the allegations of "biological warfare" for the benefit of their countries. China appeared to use the allegation to gain military and medical supports from the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union intended to prolong the Korean War through the allegation in order to learn the information of US military and to lessen the possibility of World War III by draining US military power in Asia.
This article consists of two parts. The first part examines the process of raising the allegations mainly from 1951 to 1952. The allegations of biological warfare by the US. were first raised on May 8, 1951, when Park Heon-young, a foreign minister of North Korea, issued a statement charging the US of using biological weapons but there were no ensuing allegations after that time. In 1952, the large scale propaganda of the ‘biological warfare’ allegations occurred in cooperation with North Korea, China, and the Soviet Union. Three investigation teams were, supported by those countries, also established. The second one looks into ‘evidence’ provided by communist countries was highly likely to be fabricated. This fabrication was attested to in the memoir of a head of the Chinese Army"s sanitary department, Wu Zhi-ri, as also was reaffirmed in documents of the Soviet Union, implying that the origin of allegations was from China. This, however, does not necessarily mean that the allegations were entirely manipulated. China and the Soviet Union used the allegations of "biological warfare" for the benefit of their countries. China appeared to use the allegation to gain military and medical supports from the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union intended to prolong the Korean War through the allegation in order to learn the information of US military and to lessen the possibility of World War III by draining US military power in Asia.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘세균전’ 설 제기 과정
3. ‘세균전’ 설의 내막
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (68)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
박정희 정부의 대중 · 소 외교정책 : 대통령 기록물 분석을 중심으로
아세아연구
2015 .06
-
분단초기(1945-1967) 북한 고등교육에서의 소련 제도의 전이와 변용
교육사회학연구
2017 .01
-
제2차 세계대전기 소련의 대일전 참가를 둘러싼 미 · 소 군사협력 : 무기대여법과 ‘훌라 프로젝트(Project Hula)’의 역할을 중심으로
군사
2017 .12
-
중일전쟁 전반기 중국의 항공전력 확보와 소련의 지원 : 비행기와 조종사 지원을 중심으로
아세아연구
2020 .12
-
하이브리드 전쟁에 대한 비판적 고찰
국제법평론
2022 .06
-
미⋅소 군정기 중국 언론의 북한인식 - 소련군의 점령정책을 중심으로 -
중국학보
2015 .05
-
Three Track Approaches to Verify and Destruct North Korea's Biological Weapons
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2023 .06
-
Cyber Cognitive Warfare as an Emerging New War Domain and Its Strategies and Tactics
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2022 .12
-
1958년 중국인민지원군 철군과 북한의 대응: 북･중･소 삼각관계를 중심으로
통일정책연구
2024 .06
-
주장책임에 관한 대법원 판결에 대한 고찰
법학논총
2020 .01
-
월츠의 세 가지 이미지와 한반도 분단의 원인에 관한 연구 : 탈냉전 이후 해제문헌에 대한 분석을 기초로
국제정치논총
2015 .06
-
한국의 對중국 하이브리드전 대응전략: MCDC의 대응전략 적용을 중심으로
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2024 .08
-
중동부 유럽국가와 소련 간 관계에 관한 연구: 체제전환 전후 불가리아를 중심으로
EU연구
2021 .01
-
태평양 전쟁과 중국 국민정부의 전략적 가치 변화
군사
2018 .09
-
The Japanese Surrender and the Division of Korea in1945: Why Japan Delayed its Surrender Leading to the Division of Korea
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2020 .12
-
전국시대의 전쟁양상과 그 군사사상
국방연구
2017 .01
-
북한의 생물학 위협과 한국의 대비방안
한국군사
2020 .06
-
중국의 통일정책과 법률전(法律戰)- ｢반분열국가법｣을 중심으로 -
중국법연구
2019 .01
-
중국의 미래전 전망과 전략 - “지능화 정보화 해상 국지전”과 “초한전(超限战)” -
한국국가전략
2024 .07
-
The Formation Process of Soviet Koreans' Transnational Identity as New Soviet Citizens from the 1920s to the 1930s: The Physical Cultural Activities in Primorye as Recorded in the Soviet Korean Newspaper Sunbong (Avant Garde)
Pacific Focus
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[대담] 731부대와 세균전 연구의 성과와 과제 ―국가배상 청구 소송을 중심으로
김옥주
,
정준호
,
최규진
외 1명
역사비평
2020
.08
생물화학무기와 침묵의 기억들 : 한국전쟁기 세균전에 관한 텍스트들
김민선
동악어문학
2017
.05
韓國戰爭期 중국 동북 지역 학교의 반세균전 애국위생운동
李恩珠
역사교육
2023
.06
[서평] 6·25전쟁기 군수 분야 연구의 전환점 - 국방부 군사편찬연구소(이상호 지음), 『6·25전쟁기 유엔군 군수지원체제』 -
박성진
군사
2022
.12
‘선승이후구전’을 통한 미드웨이·알류샨 전역계획 재조명 - 『손자병법』 군형(軍形)편의 ‘전장의 선택’과 ‘병법의 다섯 단계’를 중심으로 -
김동은
군사
2022
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-390-001976473