지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.101 No.3
- 발행연도
- 2021.9
- 수록면
- 167 - 180 (14page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Under the South Korea’s unique health insurance structure, any new surgical technology must be evaluated first by the government in order to consider whether that particular technology can be applied to patients for further clinical trials as categorized as ‘New Health Technology,’ then potentially covered by the insurance sometime later. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer, activated by the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) TaTME committee.
Methods: We systematically searched Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane, and Korean databases (from their inception until August 31, 2019) for studies published that compare TaTME with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME). End-points included perioperative and pathological outcomes.
Results: Sixteen cohort studies (7 for case-matched studies) were identified, comprising 1,923 patients (938 TaTMEs and 985 LaTMEs). Regarding perioperative outcomes, the conversion rate was significantly lower in TaTME (risk ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.34; P < 0.001); whereas other perioperative outcomes were similar to LaTME. There were no statistically significant differences in pathological results between the 2 procedures.
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed comparable results in preoperative and pathologic outcomes between TaTME and LaTME, and indicated the benefit of TaTME with low conversion. Extensive evaluations of well-designed, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to come to unequivocal conclusions, but the results showed that TaTME is a potentially beneficial technique in some specific cases. This meta-analysis suggests that TaTME can be performed for rectal cancer patients as a ‘New Health Technology’ endorsed by NECA in South Korea.
Methods: We systematically searched Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane, and Korean databases (from their inception until August 31, 2019) for studies published that compare TaTME with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME). End-points included perioperative and pathological outcomes.
Results: Sixteen cohort studies (7 for case-matched studies) were identified, comprising 1,923 patients (938 TaTMEs and 985 LaTMEs). Regarding perioperative outcomes, the conversion rate was significantly lower in TaTME (risk ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.34; P < 0.001); whereas other perioperative outcomes were similar to LaTME. There were no statistically significant differences in pathological results between the 2 procedures.
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed comparable results in preoperative and pathologic outcomes between TaTME and LaTME, and indicated the benefit of TaTME with low conversion. Extensive evaluations of well-designed, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to come to unequivocal conclusions, but the results showed that TaTME is a potentially beneficial technique in some specific cases. This meta-analysis suggests that TaTME can be performed for rectal cancer patients as a ‘New Health Technology’ endorsed by NECA in South Korea.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
2017 European Society of Coloproctology(ESCP)collaborating group / 2018 / An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery;operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) / Colorectal Dis 20(Suppl 6):33~46
Roberto Persiani / 2021 / The learning curve of TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer: a comprehensive analysis from a five-year institutional experience / Surgical Endoscopy 35(11):6190~6200
Sean McGrath / 2020 / Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis / Statistical Methods in Medical Research 29(9):2520~2537
Roberto Persiani / 2021 / The learning curve of TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer: a comprehensive analysis from a five-year institutional experience / Surgical Endoscopy 35(11):6190~6200
Sean McGrath / 2020 / Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis / Statistical Methods in Medical Research 29(9):2520~2537
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Short- and mid-term outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .02
-
Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision
Annals of Coloproctology
2024 .08
-
Should transanal total mesorectal excision be implemented in medium-sized colorectal unit? technical and oncological outcome
Annals of Coloproctology
2022 .06
-
Robotic TaTME
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2017 .02
-
Comparison of patient-reported quality of life and functional outcomes following laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .07
-
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Transanal Versus Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .05
-
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision versus Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Reactal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Short-term Outcomes of 1,283 Cases from A Nationwide Registry in China
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Factors influencing the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using MRI pelvimetry
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2022 .02
-
Outcomes of Transanal Local Excision Methods in Patients with Rectal Neoplasm
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
[Colorectal] Partial Mesorectal Excision Can be a Primary Option for Middle to Upper Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matched Retrospective Analysis
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage
Annals of Coloproctology
2023 .04
-
[Colorectal] Long-term Quality of Life, Urinary and Sexual Function Following Laparoscopic and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision with Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Single‑port versus multiport robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experiences by case‑matched analysis of short‑term outcomes
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .08
-
Effect of lateral lymph node dissection on the quality of life and genitourinary function after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .02
-
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Update in 2015
Cancer Research and Treatment
2016 .01
-
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision in clinical T2N0 rectal cancer
Radiation oncology journal : ROJ
2016 .01
-
Oncologic Comparison between Non-Radical Management Versus Total Mesorectal Excision in ycT0-1 After Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Mid or Low Rectal Cancer : A Retrospective Analysis Of Multicenter Prospective Cohort
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Comparison of the quality of total mesorectal excision after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0