메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
신상영 (서울연구원) 이석민 (서울연구원) 남현정 (서울연구원)
저널정보
서울연구원 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 [서울연 2020-PR-16] 뉴타운·재개발 해제지역 안전관리방안
발행연도
2020.11
수록면
1 - 124 (124page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Over the past few years, the Seoul Metropolitan Government has cancelled numerous projects focused on ‘newtown’ and redevelopment initiatives, with the number of such cancelled project sites totaling at 386 by the end of 2019. While 193 of these sites are under listing for alternative regeneration projects, the other remaining 193 sites are not listed for any future projects. As these areas with cancelled redevelopment are often older and neglected neighborhoods, with high levels of dilapidation and economic deprivation, they present an issue of safety for the inhabitants, and should be given additional special considerations in future planning policies.
This study uses geographic analysis to examine the level of safety of areas where ‘newtown’ and redevelopment schemes were cancelled, and provides policy suggestions for future safety management strategies.
Firstly, the study looks at the current status of these existing ‘cancelled’ areas, and gives an overview of current existing safety measures governing these areas. Once these newtown or redevelopment project schemes are abandoned by the planning entity, the area is often managed routinely, similar to other typically average, built-up areas. In some cases, safety management programs, such as the existence of bulding management or enhanced crime prevention regulation, are often implemented in these cancelled areas, due to their higher risk for disasters, accidents, and crime. Additionally, some of the aforementioned alternative regeneration projects newly-proposed by the government also include some safety measures, but overall, the current levels of safety measures in place remain insufficient for these cancelled areas.
Secondly, this study analyzes the safety conditions of the cancelled areas through a combination of data analysis, field survey, and questionnaires among current residents of these neighborhoods. As these cancelled areas are old and dilapidated when it comes to both their infrastructure and buildings, there is, as mentioned previously, higher levels of probability that sustained damage will occur from disasters, accidents, and crime. In particular, the presence of old or empty houses are at great risk for the occurrence of disaster and crime, partially to the narrow and steep roads, often less than 4 meters in width, which present a large barrier for emergency response. Additionally, these cancelled areas tend to hold a high proportion of vulnerable population, such as the elderly and single-person households.
Thirdly, this study proposes several strategies in order to improve safety of these cancelled areas, with these strategies relying on the classification of the cancelled areas into four types, and the recommendation of a customized safety management strategy for each of these types. Different area types should be prioritized differently when it comes to their need for safety management. Specifically, safety management measures prior to alternative regeneration stages are suggested to go alongside physical improvement driven (H/W) and activity program driven (S/W), with both the public and the private spheres acting as major stakeholders. This study also suggests several considerations of safety during the process of preparing alternative regeneration projects.

목차

[표지]
[요약]
뉴타운·재개발 해제지역 386개소 중 절반이 아직 대안사업 마련 안 돼
해제지역, 노후·불량정도 상대적으로 심각 … 안전관리대책은 미흡한 실정
해제지역, 노후 건축물·취약 건축구조·고령자 등 많아 ‘정책적 관심 필수’
해제지역 주민들 “도로 협소해 재난·사고 대응 곤란, 범죄 등에 큰 불안”
해제지역, 맞춤형 안전관리 위해 종합적 안전관리형 등 4가지 유형 분류
해제지역 유형별로 안전환경개선사업, 뉴딜형 기반시설 개선사업 등 추진
대안적 재생·정비사업 추진 때도 위험특성·안전관리 측면 적극 고려할 필요
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[01 연구개요]
1_연구배경 및 목적
2_연구내용 및 방법
[02 뉴타운·재개발 해제지역과 안전관리 현황]
1_해제지역 일반현황
2_해제지역에서의 대안적 재생·정비사업 추진현황
3_해제지역의 안전관리 현황 및 과제
[03 뉴타운·재개발 해제지역의 위험요소 분석]
1_분석방법
2_물리적 환경 및 인구특성
3_해제지역 주민들의 안전에 대한 인식 및 요구사항
[04 뉴타운·재개발 해제지역 안전관리방안]
1_안전관리 기본방향
2_해제지역 유형화를 통한 맞춤형 안전관리
3_해제지역 안전관리의 우선순위
4_대안사업 마련 이전에 필요한 안전관리대책 및 추진방안
5_대안사업 추진 시 안전관리 측면의 고려사항
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
[Contents]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-359-001918347