지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第155輯
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 449 - 486 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2021.6.155.449
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article explored the ‘Anti-Japanese wartime’ meaning of Feng Youlan’s New Rational Philosophy through examining the New Treatise on Practical Affairs, which is one of his famous works, “Six Books of Zhenyuan(貞元六書)”. In spite of its high-degree ideality, New Rational Philosophy was basically rooted from Feng Younlan’s awareness of reality in Anti-Japanese wartime China. Above all, it was the strongest inner motive for constructing New Rational Philosophy that Feng Youlan considered his philosophy as a ‘weapon’ for struggle in the Anti-Japanese wartime. Unlike the case of Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism(程朱理學), the principle(理) conceives its plurality and stratification between universality and specificity in the structure of New Rational Philosophy. It is a key point in the New Rational Philosophy that universality and specificity co-exist without one-sided oppression in the mutual relationship. New Rational Philosophy also acknowledges change of things, and in fact the change itself is located in the more universal stratum of principle.
Feng Youlan expanded the universal-special stratification of New Rational Philosophy to the level of perception of real society in the New Treatise on Practical Affairs. He stipulated economic mode of production as a more universal stratum of principle that creates a society and functions it. Based on this perception, when it comes to Sino-Western cultural difference, he converted a geographic dimension to the context of ancient and modern ages. However he considered ‘the ancient’ not as a mere static backwardness, but as possibility to progress to ‘the modern’, and perceived the history of this progression as another universal principle. The Chineseness was a critical issue in his New Treatise on Practical Affairs, too. In the Anti-Japanese wartime to put the stress on Chinese tradition, he positively approved the unique Chineseness under the condition that New Rational Philosophy concedes universality and specificity mutually.
Feng Youlan renewed the meaning of Anti-Japanese War in his New Treatise on Practical Affairs. In his perception, Anti-Japanese War was not merely armed conflict between two countries, but a war between ‘villager’ to seek to be urbanite and ‘urbanite’ to interrupt it. The composition of ‘villager/urbanite’ emerged when the economically backward/advanced relationship functioned as a realistic oppression. Thus he never viewed Anti-Japanese War as a war between two equal countries. He maintained that this war was an inevitable process of progress from villagers to urbanites, from backward to advanced, and further from the oppressed to liberation. The system of New Rational Philosophy, which assumes change itself as a universal principle, and the historical notion of New Treatise on Practical Affairs, which are embodied as history driven by the universal principle in the real phases, they all defined this war as a realization of the universal principle. In the end, New Rational Philosophy was able to secure its more realistic implication for Anti-Japanese War, because it established a thinking system that recognized the war as part of struggle for a realization of the universal principle.
Feng Youlan expanded the universal-special stratification of New Rational Philosophy to the level of perception of real society in the New Treatise on Practical Affairs. He stipulated economic mode of production as a more universal stratum of principle that creates a society and functions it. Based on this perception, when it comes to Sino-Western cultural difference, he converted a geographic dimension to the context of ancient and modern ages. However he considered ‘the ancient’ not as a mere static backwardness, but as possibility to progress to ‘the modern’, and perceived the history of this progression as another universal principle. The Chineseness was a critical issue in his New Treatise on Practical Affairs, too. In the Anti-Japanese wartime to put the stress on Chinese tradition, he positively approved the unique Chineseness under the condition that New Rational Philosophy concedes universality and specificity mutually.
Feng Youlan renewed the meaning of Anti-Japanese War in his New Treatise on Practical Affairs. In his perception, Anti-Japanese War was not merely armed conflict between two countries, but a war between ‘villager’ to seek to be urbanite and ‘urbanite’ to interrupt it. The composition of ‘villager/urbanite’ emerged when the economically backward/advanced relationship functioned as a realistic oppression. Thus he never viewed Anti-Japanese War as a war between two equal countries. He maintained that this war was an inevitable process of progress from villagers to urbanites, from backward to advanced, and further from the oppressed to liberation. The system of New Rational Philosophy, which assumes change itself as a universal principle, and the historical notion of New Treatise on Practical Affairs, which are embodied as history driven by the universal principle in the real phases, they all defined this war as a realization of the universal principle. In the end, New Rational Philosophy was able to secure its more realistic implication for Anti-Japanese War, because it established a thinking system that recognized the war as part of struggle for a realization of the universal principle.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 新理學 구축의 함의 - ‘무기’로서의 철학
Ⅲ. 보편과 특수의 사이 - 보편 원리로 추동되는 역사와 중국성(Chineseness)
Ⅳ. ‘抗戰’의 새로운 맥락 - 보편 원리를 구현하는 투쟁
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (47)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
胡適과 馮友蘭의 老子 시기 논전을 통해 본 『中國哲學史』의 성립 과정과 歐美 철학 연구방법론 영향 고찰
동방학지
2015 .01
-
펑유란(馮友蘭)의 중국철학과 철학 개념 고찰
개념과 소통
2015 .01
-
‘조선철학’ 대 ‘한국철학’ : ‘북’의 조선철학 연구 특징과 남북철학의 공동연구 가능성
시대와 철학
2019 .01
-
2000년대 이후 북한철학계의 연구경향과 그 특징―『철학연구』(2000-2016)을 중심으로―
민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
1950년대 한국의 철학연구자들에게 ‘철학’은 무엇이었나: ‘철학개론서(단행본과 번역서)’ 서문에 나타난 자기인식
사학연구
2025 .03
-
율곡 『聖學輯要』의 성왕론 - 『大學衍義』, 『聖學十圖』와 비교를 중심으로
율곡학연구
2019 .01
-
풍우란의 노장해석의 관점과 그 전변의 문제
철학논총
2016 .04
-
언어적 전회와 분석철학
건지인문학
2018 .01
-
생명철학의 함의와 도가의 생명철학적 특성
현대유럽철학연구
2020 .01
-
21세기 우리철학의 현황과 과제 - 제도권의 철학 풍토와 우리철학의 연구 동향을 중심으로 -
유학연구
2019 .01
-
우리철학의 현황과 과제(2) - 산업화시기 철학의 제도화와 연구 동향을 중심으로 -
인문학연구
2017 .01
-
풍우란의 『논어(論語)』 분석
용봉인문논총
2020 .01
-
철학으로서 불교철학의 지형과 방법
한국불교학
2016 .01
-
『규원사화』의 행간에 드러난 선도사상(仙道思想)과 철학의 근본과제로서의 신·자유·불멸
철학탐구
2023 .11
-
20세기 초 한국의 서양철학 연구와 전개 양상
대학교양교육연구
2020 .01
-
대한민국임시정부의 소비에트러시아 외교관계의 형성과 독립외교 전개 그리고 ‘비밀군사협정’
재외한인연구
2021 .06
-
『한국철학논집』의 논문 분류 및 두 학자의 논문 분석 - 제1집에서 제55집까지 -
한국철학논집
2018 .01
-
‘지구학’에 대한 방법론적 고민, 장‘ 소-세계’를 중심으로
원불교사상과종교문화
2021 .09
-
철학의 길, 그리고 우리의 길 : 철학정신과 시대정신의 교차점에서
철학탐구
2015 .02
-
중국의 서학 수용과 중국철학
日本學硏究
2024 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-910-001859920