지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In traditional international relations, the logic of "Enemy of my enemy is my friend" or "Enemy of my ally is my enemy" is established. According to the above logic, Iran is clearly an enemy of the United States, and ROK, which is an alliance with the United States, surely becomes an enemy of Iran. Conversely, for DPRK, Iran is an enemy of the United States, so they should be friends in theory, but in reality, it is not as close as in the above logic. In other words, the relationship of "Enemy of my ally is not my enemy" is established.
As such, although the relationships among ROK, DPRK and Iran are difficult to form and maintain, the reality is not. There are common interests, and as a result, the relationship continues beyond theoretical prediction. If so, what variables are the determinants of the triangle relations? Why is the ROK-DPRK-Iran triangle relations maintained differently from theoretical predictions? What is the theoretical alternative to explain the relations? This study argues that Iran"s policy on the Korean Peninsula is similar to the ‘hedging strategy’. Iran has gained economic and military benefits by appropriately using the conflict and rivalry between the two Koreas, and used it for the Iran-Iraq war and anti-US diplomacy. In conclusion, there are sources that can seek mutual benefits between the ROK-DPRK-Iran, and contrary to theoretical predictions, a paradoxical relationship is maintained.
As such, although the relationships among ROK, DPRK and Iran are difficult to form and maintain, the reality is not. There are common interests, and as a result, the relationship continues beyond theoretical prediction. If so, what variables are the determinants of the triangle relations? Why is the ROK-DPRK-Iran triangle relations maintained differently from theoretical predictions? What is the theoretical alternative to explain the relations? This study argues that Iran"s policy on the Korean Peninsula is similar to the ‘hedging strategy’. Iran has gained economic and military benefits by appropriately using the conflict and rivalry between the two Koreas, and used it for the Iran-Iraq war and anti-US diplomacy. In conclusion, there are sources that can seek mutual benefits between the ROK-DPRK-Iran, and contrary to theoretical predictions, a paradoxical relationship is maintained.
목차
1. 서론
2. 분석틀: 헤징전략(Hedging Strategy)
3. 이란-이라크 전쟁(1980-1988)
4. 전쟁 초기 남-북-이란 삼각관계
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지정학적 중간국 이란의 외교 전략 연구
한국중동학회논총
2021 .01
-
Main Characteristics of Bilateral Trade between Iran and South Korea: Focusing on Trade Diversification
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2018 .11
-
Revisiting the Proxy Intervention Theory: A Case Study of Iranian Influence in Iraq
Mediterranean review
2023 .06
-
이란 관광업계 종사자들의 한국방문 태도에 관한 연구
한국외식산업학회지
2016 .12
-
경제제재에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 북한과 이란 사례 중심으로
세계지역연구논총
2021 .12
-
The Return of U.S. Sanctions on Iran: Challenges and Prospects for Korea
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2019 .01
-
이란-이라크쿠르드정부의 불가변적 비대칭 관계와 그 견인요인 연구
지중해지역연구
2024 .02
-
2018/2019 KSP Policy Consultation Report: Iran Policy Consultation on Strengthening Iran 's Intellectual Property Infrastructure
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2019 .12
-
The Dilemma of the “Axis of Evil”: The Rise and Fall of Iran–DPRK Relations
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2019 .01
-
2018/2019 KSP Policy Consultation Report: Iran Policy Consultation on Strengthening Iran 's Intellectual Property Infrastructure TEXTBOOK
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2019 .12
-
Iran-Uzbekistan Relations in the Regional Security Context
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding
2020 .01
-
한⋅이란 관계 현황 및 개선 방향
계간 외교
2023 .07
-
미국-이란 관계 분석
국제정치연구
2020 .12
-
Korea's Economic Presence in Iran under Trump and Its Prospects during the Biden Presidency
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .10
-
유엔의 이란 경제제재 효과와 북핵 대응방안
세계지역연구논총
2019 .01
-
유엔의 이란 경제제재 효과와 북핵 대응방안
세계지역연구논총
2019 .01
-
Border Effects as a Determinant of Commodity Groups Trade Flows between Iran and Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2020 .08
-
EU의 효율적 다자주의로 본 이란 핵 협상
평화학연구
2020 .12
-
테헤란(Tehran)의 코로나19 방역에 대한 대응과 그림자
중동연구
2021 .01
-
A Proposal for Building Triangular Energy Cooperation between Korea, Iran and Turkmenistan
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2017 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국의 앙골라 PKO 부대 파병정책 결정과정 고찰
김정기
군사
2020
.12
1958년 한반도 전술핵무기 배치 요인 재고찰 - 미국의 대일정책 변화를 중심으로 -
김민식
군사
2020
.12
66년 케스티우스 갈루스(Cestius Gallus)의 전략 분석
배은숙
군사
2020
.12
[서평] 6·25전쟁기 군수 분야 연구의 전환점 - 국방부 군사편찬연구소(이상호 지음), 『6·25전쟁기 유엔군 군수지원체제』 -
박성진
군사
2022
.12
‘선승이후구전’을 통한 미드웨이·알류샨 전역계획 재조명 - 『손자병법』 군형(軍形)편의 ‘전장의 선택’과 ‘병법의 다섯 단계’를 중심으로 -
김동은
군사
2022
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-390-001838789