지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study attempts to study the frequency of siege tactics and direct attacks in a total of 167 battles carried out by Roman army during the Republican period. Of the 13 battles in the 6th-5th centuries BC, none of the encirclement battles were conducted alone. Out of 10 battles, 5 battles were conducted by encirclement, the rest ones, 5 battles were in the form of direct attack immediately. There were a total of 17 battles that took place in the 4th century BC. Only 2 battles of them had built an encircling net. After establishing a siege, After establishing a siege network, it also entered the offensive battle. There was not a single battle that was just an encircling battle. Out of a total of 36 battles in the 3rd century BC, 8 battles used the encircling tactics.
In the 2nd century BC, there were a total of 43 battles. Among them, 14 battles were carried out using the encircling tactics. There were only 2(4.7%) battles that built the encircling net. What stands out in siege wars of the 1st century BC is that the number of cases in which the siege network was established was 31(53.5%) out of 58 battles. Of these, 19(32.8%) battles formed only an encircling net, and 12(20.7%) battles attacked after establishing the siege network. Overall, however, aggressive tactics remained the same. After establishing the siege, the attack battles and the immediate attack battles amounted to 34(58.6%) battles.
What is notable in the siege of the 1st century BC is that 31(53.5%) battles of the 58 battles were launched. Among them, 19(32.8%) battles were made a formation just for the encircling net, and 12(20.7%) battles were engaged in offensive battles after establishing siege networks. After establishing the siege network, 34(58.6%) battles were immediately launched.
Analyzing a total of 167 battles fought by the Romans until the 6th-1st century BC, the Romans continued to favor aggressive tactics. Since the 3rd century BC, as siege equipment developed, more active siege wars were carried out. Siege warfare increased in the first century BC, but the overall rate was more offensive warfare. Therefore, in the battles of Numantia, Alesia, and Perusia, the sophistication of constructing the siege network by mobilizing a large number of troops and the technique of constructing the encircling net were advanced, but the encircling tactics was not a typical tactics of the Roman army.
In the 2nd century BC, there were a total of 43 battles. Among them, 14 battles were carried out using the encircling tactics. There were only 2(4.7%) battles that built the encircling net. What stands out in siege wars of the 1st century BC is that the number of cases in which the siege network was established was 31(53.5%) out of 58 battles. Of these, 19(32.8%) battles formed only an encircling net, and 12(20.7%) battles attacked after establishing the siege network. Overall, however, aggressive tactics remained the same. After establishing the siege, the attack battles and the immediate attack battles amounted to 34(58.6%) battles.
What is notable in the siege of the 1st century BC is that 31(53.5%) battles of the 58 battles were launched. Among them, 19(32.8%) battles were made a formation just for the encircling net, and 12(20.7%) battles were engaged in offensive battles after establishing siege networks. After establishing the siege network, 34(58.6%) battles were immediately launched.
Analyzing a total of 167 battles fought by the Romans until the 6th-1st century BC, the Romans continued to favor aggressive tactics. Since the 3rd century BC, as siege equipment developed, more active siege wars were carried out. Siege warfare increased in the first century BC, but the overall rate was more offensive warfare. Therefore, in the battles of Numantia, Alesia, and Perusia, the sophistication of constructing the siege network by mobilizing a large number of troops and the technique of constructing the encircling net were advanced, but the encircling tactics was not a typical tactics of the Roman army.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 기원전 6-3세기 공성전의 형태 및 특징
3. 기원전 2-1세기 공성전의 형태 및 특징
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
로마-갈리아 전쟁에서 로마군 공성전의 전술사적 의미
군사
2019 .06
-
전쟁에서 발생하는 전투의 규모와 빈도 관계에 적용되는 멱함수 분포에 대한 연구
Crisisonomy
2021 .08
-
북접농민군의 전투방식과 영동 용산전투
동학학보
2018 .09
-
러일전쟁 최후의 해상전투, ‘동해해전’ 재구성
군사
2015 .12
-
6·25전쟁기 영천전투의 재조명
한국군사학논집
2021 .02
-
임진왜란 시 청주성 전투에 관한 실증적 고찰
한국군사학논총
2020 .01
-
이스라엘의 핵개발 결정과 핵전략: 포위심성(siege mentality)의 적용
국가전략
2017 .01
-
북접농민군의 교단 거점 수비와 청주 일대의 전투
동학학보
2017 .06
-
6·25전쟁기 호주군의 참전 과정과 가평지구전투
한국군사학논집
2020 .06
-
The Seven-Year Battle: China’s Fight Against Air Pollution
Global Asia
2019 .12
-
사상 최대 레이테 해전의 전투경과 분석과 전투 교훈 고찰
한국군사학논총
2017 .06
-
사할린전투에 관한 일고(一考)
군사
2015 .12
-
영천 전투의 정치･군사적 의미 재검토
대한정치학회보
2024 .05
-
의문점 고찰(考察)을 통한 제2차 진주성 전투 재조명
한일군사문화연구
2021 .08
-
백마고지 전투의 재조명 : 국군 제9사단의 향상된 전투수행 능력 분석을 중심으로
군사
2017 .12
-
백마고지 전투 간 국군 제9사단의 화력운용 고찰 - 포병운용을 중심으로 -
군사
2020 .12
-
중간관리자의 영향력 전술이 관리효과성에 미치는 영향
대한경영학회지
2015 .02
-
후삼국 통일전쟁과 운주전투
군사
2019 .03
-
Cyber Cognitive Warfare as an Emerging New War Domain and Its Strategies and Tactics
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2022 .12
-
‘세계 4대 해전’의 근거에 대한 고찰 : 국내의 ‘세계 4대 해전’ 담론 형성과정을 중심으로
군사
2016 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-390-001838774