지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper investigates real life uses of the so-called what about and how about constructions on the basis of large, balanced contemporary American English corpus data. Previous literature has paid little attention to irregular wh-question constructions including the two as compared to typical wh-question constructions and has mainly discussed similarities between the two constructions based on individual researchers’ informal judgments with no surrounding context information for their what about and how about construction examples. The results of this corpus-based research first show that the two constructions exhibit similar behavior in that both of them occur frequently in informal, dialogue situations and that they take an NP as the most dominant dependent category. However, the results also show that when we explore their grammatical properties with regard to subtypes for each dependent category and their preferred illocutionary functions, the two are more similar than different when they combine with minor category dependents while they are more different than similar when they take proposition-denoting categories and NPs as their dependents. Taken together, our findings suggest that it is important to look into authentic properties of the what about and how about constructions depending on their dependent categories.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Some Key Properties
3. Methods
4. Corpus Findings and Discussion
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
Blendin, J. / 2019 / What ifs / Semantics and Pragmatics 12(14):1~55
Collins, C. / 1991 / MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15 / Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT :31~45
Gottschalk, K. -D / 1992 / Who Climbs the Grammar-tree: [Leaves for David Reibel] / Max Niemeyer Verlag :237~256
Hartman, J. / 2009 / Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest / Cambridge Scholars Publishing :92~122
Huddleston, R. / 2002 / The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language / Cambridge University Press
Collins, C. / 1991 / MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15 / Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT :31~45
Gottschalk, K. -D / 1992 / Who Climbs the Grammar-tree: [Leaves for David Reibel] / Max Niemeyer Verlag :237~256
Hartman, J. / 2009 / Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest / Cambridge Scholars Publishing :92~122
Huddleston, R. / 2002 / The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language / Cambridge University Press
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Corpus-Based Diachronic Investigation of the What About and How About Constructions
현대문법연구
2022 .09
-
현대중국어 존현구문과 관련구문들 간의 관계 연구
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
Subjacency Revisited: Is it Real or a Reflex of Performance Biases?
언어
2015 .09
-
The “Concealed Passive” Construction Needs Investigating Diachronically
언어학 연구
2018 .04
-
The Resolution of Wh-Scope Ambiguity in Korean and Locality Bias
어학연구
2015 .04
-
텍스트마이닝을 활용한 중국어 구문 연구 동향 분석
담화와인지
2023 .05
-
의문사 없는 WH-의문문과 ‘왜’의 통사론 (II)
현대문법연구
2024 .06
-
영어 Out-of V-ing 사역구문: 말뭉치 자료를 중심으로
언어학
2015 .01
-
Movement Constraints and Translating Korean wh-Questions into English
통번역교육연구
2016 .01
-
한국어 화자의 섬 구조 언어처리에서 나타나는 담화연결 효과에 관한 연구
현대문법연구
2017 .01
-
의문사 없는 WH-의문문과 ‘왜’의 통사론
현대문법연구
2024 .03
-
A Semantic Account of Matrix Scope of a wh-phrase in a wh-island in Korean and English
영어학
2019 .12
-
Even Wh-doublets Don't Move in a Language Without Wh-movement
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
On the Necessity of Overt and Covert Scrambling of Whs-in-situ
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
한국어와 영어의 차이에 따른 입력처리 교수가 한국 중학교 학습자들의 wh-의문문 습득에 미치는 영향
언어학
2024 .03
-
한국어 대칭구문의 중국어 대응형식 연구
외국학연구
2017 .01
-
On the (Non-)Movement of WHY: A Reply to Miyagawa (2017)
현대문법연구
2021 .01
-
Fragmental patterns in let alone construction: A corpus-based investigation
영어학
2025 .01
-
NP-Juxtaposition and Co-Involvement: A Uniform Analysis of Conjunctives, Comitatives, and Comparatives
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
동태존재구문에 대한 인지적 접근
중국어문논총
2016 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0