소변검사의 재검 시 세포원심분리법과 액상세포검사 $ThinPrep^{(R)}$의 효율성에 관한 비교

김현경; 표주연; 이윤희; 정우희; 김세훈; 홍순원

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 김현경 (연세대학교 의과대학 영동세브란스병원 진단병리과) 표주연 (연세대학교 의과대학 영동세브란스병원 진단병리과) 이윤희 (연세대학교 의과대학 영동세브란스병원 진단병리과) 정우희 (연세대학교 의과대학 영동세브란스병원 진단병리과) 김세훈 (연세대학교 의과대학 영동세브란스병원 진단병리과) 홍순원 (연세대학교 의과대학 영동세브란스병원 진단병리과)

저널정보: 대한세포병리학회 대한세포병리학회지 대한세포병리학회지 제18권 제1호

발행연도: 2007.1

수록면: 55 - 61 (7page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Once diagnosed as "cell paucity"or "atypia" by the cytospin (CS) preparation, this CS preparation does not secure a precise diagnosis by repeated testing alone. Although the ThinPrep (TP) preparation is acknowledged to show increased cellularity, performing the screening tests for the cases that have enough cellularity, according to CS, raises issues for the cost-effectiveness. To obtain a more precise diagnosis through increasing the cellularity by performing TP, we selected the cases that were diagnosed as "cell paucity" or "atypia" by CS, but they required a more precise diagnosis, and the samples were processed via both CS and TP to compare the results. 11 patients diagnosed as "cell paucity" and 22 patients diagnosed as "atypia" by CS participated in this study. When the detection rate of atypical cells in both preparations with repeated urine cytology was compared, the overall detection rate of TP (16cases, 48.5%) was superior than that of CS (11cases, 33.3%), with statistical significance. The cellularity of both preparations was compared on repeated urine cytology; the general cellularity of TP (29cases, 87.9%) was higher than that of CS (20cases, 60.6%), but there was no statistical significance. Particularly, we repeated the TP for the 1 case that was diagnosed as "atypia" and we performed polyoma virus immunohistochemical staining, which confirmed polyoma virus. In conclusion, we can avoid obtaining negative diagnosis from cases with uncertain "atypia" or "cell paucity" by performing repeated TP testing.

#Repeated urine cytology #Cytospin #ThinPrep #Cell paucity #Atypia

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!