지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The main theme of this study is about North Korea's contemporary military strategy which remained a blind spot in the 21st century. Indeed, Pyongyang's contemporary military strategy is evolved from the logic of War. On the basis of this logic, this study examined North Korea's contemporary military strategy with three analytical frameworks. The first is the discovery of Clausewitz's dictums and application of the Trinitarian analysis on the Korean cases. During the course of applying Clausewitzian main dictum--War as continuation of politics, the methodological analysis on war played a important role generalizing the pattern and matrix of North Korea's strategic thinking and military strategy. In particular, Clausewitz's Trinitarian framework on war -Government (reason), Army (chance), People (passion)- was a universal framework to scrutinize the North Korean missile and nuclear strategy. The second is about the matrix of North Korea's military strategy, The study suggested the genealogical feature of Pyongyang's military strategy. In principle, the dictum of 'Military-First Politics' 1S the combination of the political philosophy, Chuch'e (self-reliance) of Kim Il Sung and Kin Jong Il reflected in the military readiness. As a result this analysis was able to equate Clausewitz's dictums to explain Pyongyang's idea of the nature of war in that North Korea's military strategy is the central instrument of delivery to achieve political objectives. The third is about the theoretical encounter of 'Clausewitz's Wonderful Trinity' and 'Remarkable Trinity on North Korea's contemporary strategy'. On the basis, three elements are connected to one of three groups in society; the people, the military, and the government. In order to apply the Clausewitz's Trinitarian analysis into Kim Jong Il's 'Military-First' strategy, two case studies (Missile and Nuclear strategy) were examined. The finding of this study is that Clausewitzian dictum in the 19th century is still valid in the 21st century as it provided plausible theoretical framework to explain the North Korean contemporary military strategy with a reminder that the nature and logic of war are fixed in the socially constructed state.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Military Strategy of North Korea
국제정치논총
1980 .12
-
북한 군사전략의 역사적 고찰
군사
2019 .09
-
6·25전쟁 시 북한의 남침 억제실패 원인에 대한 연구 : 6·25전쟁 이전(1948∼1950년) 남북한의 군사전략을 중심으로
군사
2012 .12
-
북한 핵무기 위협에 대한 총력적 대비의 실태와 과제
군사
2016 .06
-
북한의 핵 위협에 대응한 한국의 군사전략
국가전략
2017 .01
-
Calculated Adventurism: North Korea’s Military-Diplomatic Campaigns
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2004 .01
-
A Thought on North Korea’s Nuclear Doctrine
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
Time to Balance Deterrence, Offense, and Defense? Rethinking South Korea’s Strategy against the North Korean Nuclear Threat
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2012 .01
-
북한 핵문제 전개과정과 해결방안
통일정책연구
2015 .01
-
North Korea's Military Capabilities and Its Strategy Toward South Korea
아세아연구
1977 .07
-
Political and Military Interests of North Korea
아세아연구
1980 .01
-
북한 핵에 대한 군사적 대응태세와 과제 분석
국제관계연구
2012 .10
-
북한의 핵실험과 중국의 군사외교적 대응
한국군사학논집
2010 .06
-
클라우제비츠 「戰爭論」의 ‘3位1體論’ 小考
군사
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0