메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국청각언어재활학회 Audiology and Speech Research Audiology and Speech Research 제15권 제4호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
273 - 282 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to verify the test-retest reliability of the Korean version of the tinnitus primary function questionnaire (K-TPFQ) and to propose a simplified version of the K-TPFQ. Methods: In the test-retest reliability measure of the K-TPFQ, 31 participants were asked to complete the K-TPFQ on two occasions. Correlation between the results of the two questionnaires was confirmed by Pearson correlation coefficient. Then, a total of 110 subjects participated in the proposed, simplified version. Following factor analysis of the K-TPFQ, three items with high factor loadings for each subscale were selected as simplified version items. Internal consistency and validity were analyzed for the 12 items of the simplified version of the K-TPFQ. Results: The results of the test-retest reliability analysis of K-TPFQ showed significantly high correlations in all items, subscales, and total scores (r = 0.598-0.927). As a result of factor analysis, all items in each subscale showed high communalities. Therefore, we extracted 3 items with high content validity and high factor loadings from each subscale and adopted a total of 12 items for the simplified version. The results of the internal consistency test of the simplified version showed good validity and significantly high internal consistency of all items and subscales (α = 0.839-0.950). Conclusion: This study verified the high reliability and validity of the K-TPFQ. Therefore, it can be used to effectively evaluate the secondary effects of tinnitus in domestic clinics. In addition, the simplified version will reduce the time for evaluating tinnitus sufferers.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0