메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sung Hee Ru (State University of New York at Binghamton)
저널정보
서울대학교 사회발전연구소 Journal of Asian Sociology Journal of Asian Sociology Vol.49 No.2
발행연도
2020.6
수록면
253 - 280 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As contemporary China’s notable economic growth became one of the most popular research themes in the field of social science, China’s long-term historical path prior to the twentieth century continued to stimulate the curiosity of world-systems researchers. Among world-systems researchers, G. Arrighi is the most interested in China’s long-term and unique economic development. By providing us with theoretical conceptions of ‘industrious revolution,’ ‘trade network of East Asian region,’ and ‘business network of the overseas Chinese,’ he has tried to reveal the origins and dynamics of Chinese mode of production and link the glorious past of China (pre-nineteenth century China) and present glory of China (post-late twentieth century). Despite the original contributions to shedding a new light on the historical capitalism of China, Arrighi’s theory was still in a quandary. First, Arrighi fails to present detailed explanations of how China was incorporated into the capitalist world-economy since at least the nineteenth century, how the unique Chinese economic system (non-capitalist system) had been mixed with the European world-economy (capitalist system). Second, while equating Chinese economic cycle and the economic cycle of East Asian region and focusing on common grounds among East Asian countries, Arrighi could not explain of how each of East Asian countries have different politico-economic path during and after its own incorporation process. Last, he did not present compelling reasons of why the 500-years East Asian network is exceptional as compared to previously flourishing East Asian trade network. To make a good use of Arrighi’s intellectual legacy, I argue that it is the time to turn our attention to China’s incorporation process.

목차

Theoretical Debates Regarding China’s Growth
Arrighi’s Approach: China’s Unique Developmental Path within its Long Historical Context
Arrighi’s Dilemma Regarding China and the East Asian Region
How to Make the Most of Arrighi’s Legacy
China’s Incorporation Process in the 19th Century
Conclusion: Using Arrighi’s Legacy as a Way to Locate China’s Capitalist Transition
References

참고문헌 (103)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-331-000873727