지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
한중 경제교류 30년의 동향과 경기도 정책 방향
Trends on Korea-China Economic Exchange for 30 Years and Policy Direction of Gyeonggi-do
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 110 (110page)
이용수
한중 경제교류 30년의 동향과 경기도 정책 방향
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The establishmen of dioplomatic relations between Korea and China in 1992 was one of the most momentous events in the two countries’ diplomatic history. Since the diplomatic relations between Korea and China, economic cooperation between Korea and China has increased rapidly, and over the past 30 years, Korea"s exports to China have increased 60 times and imports 38 times. Over the past 30 years, economic and trade cooperation has grown to benefit both sides. As of 2021, China"s share of foreign trade by major countries was 12.5% in the United States, 6.2% in Japan, and 6.0% in Korea, and Korea grew into China"s third-largest trading partner. As of 2021, the dependence on China among foreign trade in Gyeonggi-do was 32.8%, and 40.4% including Hong Kong.
China"s economic and industrial has advanced and economic cooperation between Korea and China also need to adapt to changes. Korea-China trade changed from light industry to higher value-added business. Undergoing industrial upgrading of China and rising cost within China can make structural changes in economic cooperation and become major reason of the recent decline Korea and Gyeonggi-do"s trade volume with China. China"s economic growth is slowdown, and it began to emerge as a voice of concern.
Korea and China have developed into a together for 30 years, but in the lately, the trade relations is highly likely to change due to changes in the Chinese government’s industrial strategy and trade environment. As Korea and China trade enters a new phase, an institutional basis for creating investment environment and adapting to market to market changes is important, and extension of information exchange of the Korea-China trade should be promoted in line with new turning point. Gyeonggi-do needs support to expand opportunities for SMEs to access markets in China.
The implications of this paper are as follows. First, Gyeonggi-do should expand market access opportunities and two-way exchange projects between local governments and the economy for exchange and cooperation with China. Second, It is necessary to strengthen the functions of GBC installed in China to expand the discovery and introduction functions of local buyers, strengthen the exhibition and promotion functions of SME products exported by Gyeonggi-do. Third, Korea-China trade will be reorganized around the a new corporate ecosystem in the future, and Gyeonggi-do’s economic strategy is very important as it enhance capabilities to expand economic exchanges. Fourth, Gyeonggi-do, local governments in China, and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry participate in cooperative relationships, and it is necessary to expand exchanges such as businessman-centered seminars and fairs in both regions.
China"s economic and industrial has advanced and economic cooperation between Korea and China also need to adapt to changes. Korea-China trade changed from light industry to higher value-added business. Undergoing industrial upgrading of China and rising cost within China can make structural changes in economic cooperation and become major reason of the recent decline Korea and Gyeonggi-do"s trade volume with China. China"s economic growth is slowdown, and it began to emerge as a voice of concern.
Korea and China have developed into a together for 30 years, but in the lately, the trade relations is highly likely to change due to changes in the Chinese government’s industrial strategy and trade environment. As Korea and China trade enters a new phase, an institutional basis for creating investment environment and adapting to market to market changes is important, and extension of information exchange of the Korea-China trade should be promoted in line with new turning point. Gyeonggi-do needs support to expand opportunities for SMEs to access markets in China.
The implications of this paper are as follows. First, Gyeonggi-do should expand market access opportunities and two-way exchange projects between local governments and the economy for exchange and cooperation with China. Second, It is necessary to strengthen the functions of GBC installed in China to expand the discovery and introduction functions of local buyers, strengthen the exhibition and promotion functions of SME products exported by Gyeonggi-do. Third, Korea-China trade will be reorganized around the a new corporate ecosystem in the future, and Gyeonggi-do’s economic strategy is very important as it enhance capabilities to expand economic exchanges. Fourth, Gyeonggi-do, local governments in China, and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry participate in cooperative relationships, and it is necessary to expand exchanges such as businessman-centered seminars and fairs in both regions.
목차
[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
[제2장 지난 30년간 한국과 중국의 경제 현황]
1. 중국의 경제 현황
2. 한국의 경제 현황
[제3장 한 · 중 수교 이후 경제협력 현황]
1. 한국 및 경기도의 대중국 경제교류 현황
2. 한국 및 경기도의 대중국 경쟁 및 보완관계
[제4장 한국 및 경기도의 대중국 경제협력 방향]
1. 한중간 경제협력 전망
2. 경기도의 대중국 경제협력 방향 및 방안
[제5장 결론 및 정책제안]
1. 결론
2. 정책제안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
China's New Trade Strategy amid US-China Confrontation and Implications
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .03
-
Study on the Changes in China's Industrial Policies and Industrial Structures in Manufacturing Sector after China's Reform and Opening
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2021 .04
-
The US-China Trade Dispute and China’s Responses
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .12
-
중국의 한중교류사 연구 현황과 특징
동북아 문화연구
2016 .12
-
The Effect of Changes in the US Monetary Policy on China's Capital Market Stability and Trade between China and Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2015 .12
-
미-중 무역 분쟁의 원인과 주요 변수에 관한 연구
한중사회과학연구
2018 .01
-
Trilateral Trade and Taking a Side Between the U.S. and China
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2020 .01
-
Structural Changes in China's Import and Implications for the Korean Economy
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2016 .02
-
한국의 대중국 직접투자 및 무역 특징과 대응 방안
무역연구
2019 .01
-
Analysis of Korea-China Trade Structure before and after COVID-19
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2023 .07
-
Korea-China Digital Cooperation: Preparing for the Next Step
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2022 .07
-
North Korea's Trade with China in 2015: Analysis and Forecasts
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2016 .07
-
Digital Trade in China and Its Implications
KIET Industrial Economic Review
2020 .12
-
The U.S. - China Trade War : Is it More Pain than Gain?
Journal of China Studies
2020 .01
-
한중수교 30주년: 한중관계 회고와 그 미래
아시아연구
2022 .02
-
An Overview of China’s “Two Koreas Policy”: China’s Korean Peninsula Policy in the Era of U.S.-China Rivalry and Korea-China Cooperation
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .12
-
중국의 제조업 발전 현황과 한국의 대응방안
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2017 .12
-
A Study on the Cooperation Potential and Influencing Factors of Korea-China Digital Trade
한국무역학회 학술대회
2023 .04
-
U.S. Trade Policy against China: U.S. Perspectives and Implications
IFANS FOCUS
2019 .12
-
미·중 무역 갈등에 대한 한국 기업의 대응전략에 관한 연구
무역연구
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한중 OTT 서비스 현황에 따른 한국 영상 콘텐츠의 중국 OTT 시장 진출에 관한 탐색과 연구
진위남
,
김종완
영상문화콘텐츠연구
2023
.02
AIIB와 일대일로, 한중경제협력 방안
최필수
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2016
.02
중국 제14차 5개년 계획 산업 정책 및 한중 협력에 관한 연구 - 글로벌 가치사슬 측면으로 -
劉宇
무역학회지
2021
.12
한중일 경제협력 심화와 한반도의 대응과제
오승렬
국토
2013
.12
미국 노동조합 성장요인 분석과 전망 : 노조 성장사를 중심으로
류두하
한국사회과학연구
1994
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
첫번째 댓글을 남겨주세요.