지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Vol.7 No.3 SEPTEMBER 2004
- 발행연도
- 2004.9
- 수록면
- 37 - 63 (27page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to elucidate the Japanese people’s memory of Japanese plundering in Asia at the end of the nineteenth century that started the Donghak Peasant Uprising and Sino-Japanese War. Below, each of the total six sections of this essay will be summarized.
The first section presents the backdrop of the currently existing Japanese right-wing phenomenon that helped elect Ishihara Shintaro into office, and highlights how historical understanding becomes beautified and “distorted” with an in-depth analysis of the nineteenth century, when Japanese plunder in Asia sparked the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars.
The second section covers the distortions of Japanese historical textbooks as represented in the Saeroun yeoksa gyogwaseo (The New History Textbook), issued in 2001, and analyzes the related accounts between the rise of the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars and points out how this historical “distorted” memory actually gets reproduced in contemporary Japanese society.
The third section analyzes the deeply rooted history of Japanese distorted facts concerning the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars, starting with the “royal edict propaganda” of 1894, the government’s first history textbook, official military histories, and clears up the facts of where the formation of Japanese “distorted” memory originated by looking at similar past textbooks, war history books, researchers, etc.
The fourth section clears up nothing less than the origin of the Japanese “distorted” memory of the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars - the facts about the first use of armed forces to “seize the Joseon Royal Palace incident” that started the Donghak War and related historical materials that were, from the outset, fabricated by the Japanese government administrators and militarists.
The fifth section studies the records left behind by the Donghak Peasant Army Leader, Jeon Bong-Jun, the Righteous Army Leader, Seo Sang-Cheol, and the former scholar official, Hwang Hyeon to see how the Joseon people undertood the “seizure of the Joseon Royal Palace incident.” All of them understood that the “seizure of the Joseon Royal Palace incident” was clearly an act of plunder. Their kind of understanding at that time is diametrically opposed to that of the Japanese.
Lastly, the conclusion points out how, as the Japanese reproduce the “distorted” memory of history and beautify their aggressive war, the relationship between both Korea and Japan in a genuine era of exchange will continue be difficult.
The first section presents the backdrop of the currently existing Japanese right-wing phenomenon that helped elect Ishihara Shintaro into office, and highlights how historical understanding becomes beautified and “distorted” with an in-depth analysis of the nineteenth century, when Japanese plunder in Asia sparked the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars.
The second section covers the distortions of Japanese historical textbooks as represented in the Saeroun yeoksa gyogwaseo (The New History Textbook), issued in 2001, and analyzes the related accounts between the rise of the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars and points out how this historical “distorted” memory actually gets reproduced in contemporary Japanese society.
The third section analyzes the deeply rooted history of Japanese distorted facts concerning the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars, starting with the “royal edict propaganda” of 1894, the government’s first history textbook, official military histories, and clears up the facts of where the formation of Japanese “distorted” memory originated by looking at similar past textbooks, war history books, researchers, etc.
The fourth section clears up nothing less than the origin of the Japanese “distorted” memory of the Donghak Peasant and Sino-Japanese Wars - the facts about the first use of armed forces to “seize the Joseon Royal Palace incident” that started the Donghak War and related historical materials that were, from the outset, fabricated by the Japanese government administrators and militarists.
The fifth section studies the records left behind by the Donghak Peasant Army Leader, Jeon Bong-Jun, the Righteous Army Leader, Seo Sang-Cheol, and the former scholar official, Hwang Hyeon to see how the Joseon people undertood the “seizure of the Joseon Royal Palace incident.” All of them understood that the “seizure of the Joseon Royal Palace incident” was clearly an act of plunder. Their kind of understanding at that time is diametrically opposed to that of the Japanese.
Lastly, the conclusion points out how, as the Japanese reproduce the “distorted” memory of history and beautify their aggressive war, the relationship between both Korea and Japan in a genuine era of exchange will continue be difficult.
목차
Introduction: The “Brilliant” Entry of Ishihara Shintaro, an In-Depth Analysis of This Phenomenon.
The Emergence of the “Donghak Peasant Uprising and the Sino-Japanese War” in Saeroun yeoksa gyogwaseo (New History Textbook)
The Japanese “Distorted” Memory of the Donghak Peasant Uprising and the Sino-Japanese War
The Source of the Distorted Memory of the “Seizure of the Joseon Royal Palace Incident”? A Fabricated Case.
Joseon People’s Understanding of the “Seizure of the Joseon Royal Palace Incident”
Conclusion: Can the common understanding of the Joseon and Japanese people’s indeed open up?
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동학농민전쟁과 일본군
역사연구
2014 .12
-
[기획: 한국사상 전쟁기억과 기억전쟁] 19세기 말 동아시아 전쟁에 대한 일본인의 '왜곡된' 기억
역사와현실
2004 .03
-
동학농민혁명기 在朝日本人의 전쟁협력 실태와 그 성격
한국독립운동사연구
2010 .08
-
동학농민전쟁에 대한 역사교과서 서술 내용의 새로운 모색 : 동아시아적 시각과 ‘나눔과 배려’의 정신을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2012 .04
-
The Connection of the Sino-Japanese War and the Peasant War of 1894
Korea Journal
1994 .12
-
1894年 日本軍의 東學農民軍 虐殺
역사와실학
2008 .06
-
청일전쟁에 대한 한·일의 기억과 전승 : 증폭과 망각의 양극
역사와 세계
2014 .12
-
대만의 대학 역사교재 분석 —중국근대사(1840~1910년) 속의 한중관계사를 중심으로—
史叢(사총)
2009 .01
-
[한국 근대Ⅰ] 성찰, 화해, 포용의 동아시아사를 위해
역사학보
2016 .10
-
동학과 유교의 관련성에 대한 검토
역사연구
2014 .12
-
Japanese Studies in Korea
Korea Journal
1965 .06
-
유교지식인의 東學 인식과 대응
역사연구
2014 .12
-
Study of Japanese History in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
농민전쟁의 계승과 그 계보
역사연구
2014 .12
-
고흥지역의 민족운동과 1894년 동학농민전쟁 - [高興郡敎區歷史]를 중심으로
남도문화연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000954954