메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이재성 (리더스) 성주한 (창신대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제18권 제2호 (통권 제48호)
발행연도
2020.06
수록면
147 - 166 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to examine the development risk factors through the step-by-step approach of urban development projects by project method, focusing on Pyeongtaek area. In the comparison by business method, the risk of only the exchange method is caused by problems in demand and supply that do not judge the business disruption and interest rate policy due to zoning without thorough feasibility review, and instability of the development project due to tax fluctuation, developer financial company, construction It was considered to be a signing of an agreement with and against adverse conditions. In other words, because the project implementer conducts the project without purchasing land according to the characteristics of the replotting method, it is because the zoning and cooperation with the business agency, financial company, and contractor are judged to be important. In addition, the risks of the adoption and use method are due to the inability to permit or delay due to the lack of review of the upper plan and the upper regulations, and the delay in the development business due to the lack of liquidity due to the loan regulation of the pre-sale due to the financial policy after the sale, and the wrong construction contract. saw. This is because the project operator takes a lot of funds in the early stages as a method of negotiation purchase or acceptance, and thus, when the project is prolonged due to incapacity or delay in licensing, changes in financial policy, and lack of liquidity, the effect of the risk factor is greatly affected. Because. Lastly, it was considered that the risk of mixed-use only was business disruption due to cancellation of designation due to incorrect designation and unforeseen unsold sale. In other words, because the business is conducted by classifying the installation cost of each infrastructure by designating it as a replotting method and a receiving method, many complaints are generated during the process, and if the project is canceled or delayed for a long time, the risk factor is greatly affected. Because it appears.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 평택시 도시개발사업의 사업방식별 리스크의 이론적 근거 및 선행연구
Ⅲ. 평택시 도시개발사업의 현황
Ⅳ. 실증연구
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0