지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.6
- 수록면
- 286 - 297 (12page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study compared the perception of customers from Korea and the U.S. on the attributes of different formats of menu labeling The specific objectives were 1) to compare the customers" perceived usefulness, ease-of-understanding, clarity, and attractiveness of different formats of menu labeling between Korea and the U.S.; and 2) to compare the customers" use intention to different formats of menu labeling between Korea and the U.S.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A survey was conducted in Korea and the U.S. The participants were allocated randomly to view 1 of the 7 restaurant menus that varied according to the following types of menu labeling formats: (type 1) kcal format, (type 2) traffic-light format, (type 3) percent daily intake (%DI) format, (type 4) kcal + traffic-light format, (type 5) kcal + %DI format, (type 6) traffic-light + %DI format, and (type 7) kcal + traffic-light + %DI format. A total of 279 Koreans and 347 Americans were entered in the analysis. An independent t-test and 1-way analysis of variance were performed.
RESULTS: Koreans rated type 4 format (kcal + traffic light) the highest for usefulness and attractiveness. In contrast, Americans rated type 7 (kcal + traffic light + %DI) the highest for usefulness, ease-of-understanding, attractiveness, and clarity. Significant differences were found in the customers" perceived attributes to menu labeling between Korea and the U.S. Americans perceived higher for all the 4 attributes of menu labeling than Koreans.
CONCLUSIONS: The study is unique in identifying the differences in the attributes of different formats of menu labeling between Korea and the U.S. Americans rated the most complicated type of menu labeling as the highest perception for the attributes, and showed a higher use intention of menu labeling than Koreans. This study contributes to academia and industry for practicing menu labeling in different countries using different formats.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A survey was conducted in Korea and the U.S. The participants were allocated randomly to view 1 of the 7 restaurant menus that varied according to the following types of menu labeling formats: (type 1) kcal format, (type 2) traffic-light format, (type 3) percent daily intake (%DI) format, (type 4) kcal + traffic-light format, (type 5) kcal + %DI format, (type 6) traffic-light + %DI format, and (type 7) kcal + traffic-light + %DI format. A total of 279 Koreans and 347 Americans were entered in the analysis. An independent t-test and 1-way analysis of variance were performed.
RESULTS: Koreans rated type 4 format (kcal + traffic light) the highest for usefulness and attractiveness. In contrast, Americans rated type 7 (kcal + traffic light + %DI) the highest for usefulness, ease-of-understanding, attractiveness, and clarity. Significant differences were found in the customers" perceived attributes to menu labeling between Korea and the U.S. Americans perceived higher for all the 4 attributes of menu labeling than Koreans.
CONCLUSIONS: The study is unique in identifying the differences in the attributes of different formats of menu labeling between Korea and the U.S. Americans rated the most complicated type of menu labeling as the highest perception for the attributes, and showed a higher use intention of menu labeling than Koreans. This study contributes to academia and industry for practicing menu labeling in different countries using different formats.
목차
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Customers" perception of the attributes of different formats of menu labeling: a comparison between Korea and the U.S.
Nutrition Research and Practice
2020 .06
-
Impact of Different Menu Labeling Formats on Healthiness Evaluation and Menu Choices for Side Menu Items in Fast Food Restaurants among the College Students in the US
동아시아식생활학회지
2020 .08
-
Parents’ meal choices for their children at fast food and family restaurants with different menu labeling presentations
Nutrition Research and Practice
2018 .06
-
Parents’ meal choices for their children at fast food and family restaurants with different menu labeling presentations
Nutrition Research and Practice
2018 .06
-
시니어 건강메뉴 선택속성이 지각된 가치와 지속이 용의도에 미치는 영향
조리교육연구
2024 .12
-
현 영양표시제도로 파악할 수 있는 한국인의 영양소 섭취 정보의 범위 : 2013년 국민건강영양조사 자료를 이용하여
대한지역사회영양학회지
2018 .04
-
Perception and practice regarding allergen labeling : focus on food-related employees
Nutrition Research and Practice
2016 .08
-
Perception and practice regarding allergen labeling : focus on food-related employees
Nutrition Research and Practice
2016 .08
-
용인지역 고등학생의 식품표시제에 대한 인식도
동아시아식생활학회지
2017 .02
-
서울 일부 지역 학교 청소년들의 식품/영양 라벨링에 대한 중요도-수행도 연구
Journal of Nutrition and Health
2017 .08
-
L(3; 2; 1)-LABELING FOR CYLINDRICAL GRID: THE CARTESIAN PRODUCT OF A PATH AND A CYCLE
한국수학논문집
2017 .06
-
영양표시타입이 가정간편식 건강성 평가와 구매의도에 미치는 영향
대한지역사회영양학회지
2022 .10
-
사찰음식을 활용한 단체 급식 식단 개발
대한지역사회영양학회지
2015 .10
-
음식점 원산지표시제에 관한 중요도-만족도 분석
한국식품조리과학회지
2015 .01
-
Can Dining Alone Lead to Healthier Menu Item Decisions than Dining with Others? The Roles of Consumption Orientation and Menu Nutrition Information
대한지역사회영양학회지
2021 .06
-
어린이급식관리지원센터에서 제공하는 어린이집 식단의 식품군 및 음식군 다양성에 관한 기술연구
대한지역사회영양학회지
2023 .12
-
성인 소비자의 육류 안전성에 대한 우려도 및 육류 관련 표시제 이용 실태 분석
동아시아식생활학회지
2019 .08
-
경기지역 고등학생의 가공식품 구매 시 식품표시 인식 및 확인에 관한 연구 : 성별과 식품표시 인식여부를 중심으로
과학논집
2016 .02
-
One Menu Please: Parents Want Affordable, Right-sized Portions for Their Children in Restaurants
Clinical Nutrition Research
2018 .01
-
Impacts of menu information quality and nutrition information quality on technology acceptance characteristics and behaviors toward fast food restaurants’ kiosk
Nutrition Research and Practice
2020 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-594-000669208