지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.1
- 수록면
- 71 - 79 (9page)
- DOI
- 10.51979/KSSLS.2020.01.79.71
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to draw up issues and prior discussion tasks of the sports innovation committee and the KSOC concerning the separation of the KOC from the KSOC.
Method: The literature analysis was carried out in three stages in the process of clarifying claims, drawing issues, and presenting tasks.
Results: Study results and discussions were presented separately as analysis of arguments & issues, and task presentation on prior discussion.
In the analysis of arguments & issues, the arguments of the Sports Innovation Committee and the KSOC were analyzed to draw up the issues. The sports innovation committee recommended the separation of the two organizations, and the KSOC proposed a non-separation position. Here the issue arose in terms of autonomy and approach. In terms of autonomy, there has been a dispute over whether the separation of the two organizations is related to the infringement of autonomy set forth in the IOC Charter. In terms of the approach, there were differences in the process, approach and timing of the two organizations’ recommendations for separation.
In the task presentation on prior discussion, three prior discussion tasks were observed. First of all, they suggested ways to cooperate with each other, a crucial cause that led to the integration of the two organizations. Second, they believed that to reach a clearer conclusion on the issue of the separation of the two organizations, separate discussions from the advanced sports system of sport-for-all and elite sport were necessary. Third, it was suggested that the discussion of separation of the two organizations as means of establishing an autonomous system should be conducted in advance without external influence or interference.
Conclusion: The results of the study were summarized. And three future research projects have been presented. The first is the need for recognition research. The second is the need for history research. Third, it suggests that overseas case studies should be followed up.
Method: The literature analysis was carried out in three stages in the process of clarifying claims, drawing issues, and presenting tasks.
Results: Study results and discussions were presented separately as analysis of arguments & issues, and task presentation on prior discussion.
In the analysis of arguments & issues, the arguments of the Sports Innovation Committee and the KSOC were analyzed to draw up the issues. The sports innovation committee recommended the separation of the two organizations, and the KSOC proposed a non-separation position. Here the issue arose in terms of autonomy and approach. In terms of autonomy, there has been a dispute over whether the separation of the two organizations is related to the infringement of autonomy set forth in the IOC Charter. In terms of the approach, there were differences in the process, approach and timing of the two organizations’ recommendations for separation.
In the task presentation on prior discussion, three prior discussion tasks were observed. First of all, they suggested ways to cooperate with each other, a crucial cause that led to the integration of the two organizations. Second, they believed that to reach a clearer conclusion on the issue of the separation of the two organizations, separate discussions from the advanced sports system of sport-for-all and elite sport were necessary. Third, it was suggested that the discussion of separation of the two organizations as means of establishing an autonomous system should be conducted in advance without external influence or interference.
Conclusion: The results of the study were summarized. And three future research projects have been presented. The first is the need for recognition research. The second is the need for history research. Third, it suggests that overseas case studies should be followed up.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 주장과 쟁점에 대한 분석결과
Ⅳ. 선행 논의에 관한 과제제시
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
체육회의 통합과정과 정책과제
한국사회체육학회지
2018 .02
-
대한체육회 주관 기초종목 선수 육성사업 개선방안
한국체육정책학회지
2022 .02
-
대한민국 스포츠 유관기관의 갈등과 한계 고찰
한국체육과학회지
2022 .02
-
통합체육회의 구조적 연동체계 분석
한국체육정책학회지
2020 .05
-
국가스포츠정책위원회 출범을 둘러싼 스포츠 조직 간 갈등에 관한 연구 : 문화체육관광부와 대한체육회 간의 관계를 중심으로
한국사회체육학회지
2024 .07
-
스포츠단체의 재정적 자립을 위한 방안- 대한체육회를 중심으로 -
스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법
2018 .01
-
사회연결망분석(SNA)을 통한 스포츠조직 운영의 효율성 제고 방안 : 대한체육회를 중심으로
한국체육과학회지
2015 .04
-
대한체육회의 첫 번째 통합에 대한 역사적 의미
체육과학연구
2020 .01
-
Integration & Separation
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .11
-
국민체육진흥공단 올림픽 가치 확산 방안 탐색
한국체육정책학회지
2021 .11
-
대한체육회 회원종목단체의 평가 제도 변천사
체육과학연구
2021 .12
-
한국 최초의 올림픽 참가 과정 연구: 국내 단체결성 및 활동을 중심으로
한국체육사학회지
2022 .09
-
스포츠선수의 퍼블리시티권 운용에 관한 연구 - 대한체육회 마케팅규정을 중심으로 -
스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법
2019 .01
-
학교체육진흥관점에서 바라본 대한체육회의 행정조직 분석
한국체육과학회지
2017 .12
-
대한체육회 수업 참여자의 수업환경 만족, 운동몰입 및 운동 지속 의도 간의 관계: 천안시 체육회 참여자를 중심으로
한국스포츠학회
2019 .01
-
올림픽 신규 종목 도입이 올림픽의 이미지, 태도, 시청 의도에 미치는 영향 : 밀레니얼 세대를 중심으로
한국사회체육학회지
2022 .04
-
공공체육기관 유튜브 콘텐츠의 주제 유형 및 관심도 분석 : 대한체육회 유튜브 채널을 중심으로
한국체육과학회지
2024 .08
-
S4GG 평가모델을 적용한 대한체육회 회원종목단체 굿 거버넌스 이행수준 평가
한국체육정책학회지
2023 .05
-
빅데이터를 활용한 올림픽 담론분석
한국체육과학회지
2024 .08
-
IOC 올림픽 헌장의 국내법적 효력 -통합체육회와 올림픽 헌장 준수를 중심으로 -
스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0