지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.11
- 수록면
- 187 - 211 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2019.11.30.4.187
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of the amendment of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT (Act No. 35 of 1971) in 2018 on our ACT on Distribution and Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products (SAFact). Several facts have been confirmed for this purpose.
First, the wholesale market and the legal system for agricultural and fishery products in Korea have been strongly influenced by Japan from the beginning. This influence does not seem to have changed much from Market Rules (Nr. 136) in 1914 to SAFact.
Second, the contents of the enactment of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT and the revisions in 1999 and 2004 were confirmed, and the causes of these revisions were introduced. In addition, the revised contents of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT in 2018 were compared with the contents of 2014 revision. As a result of the amendment in 2018 we conclude that Japanese Wholesale Market has changed from a market that guarantees fairness to a market that pursues efficiency only.
Third, we confirmed the structure of SAFact and introduced the amendment of SAFact since 2000. In addition, we tried to analyze the relationship between these amendments to the amendments of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT. We believe that the contents of the individual amendments have been strongly influenced by the amendments of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT in 1999 and 2004. Therefore the amendment of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT in 2018 is sensitive to our academic and business walkst.
In conclusion, we analyzed whether these sensitive responses are valid from the view of Comparative Law. For this purpose, we introduced the meaning of comparative Law. In this regard, the Japanese wholesale market and our wholesale market are not comparable. It was also criticized that the introduction of various institutions under the influence of Japan into our SAFact was also done without comparative legal arguments. Therefore, we argued that we should no longer be bound by Japanese Wholesale Market ACT, but should form our own legal system.
First, the wholesale market and the legal system for agricultural and fishery products in Korea have been strongly influenced by Japan from the beginning. This influence does not seem to have changed much from Market Rules (Nr. 136) in 1914 to SAFact.
Second, the contents of the enactment of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT and the revisions in 1999 and 2004 were confirmed, and the causes of these revisions were introduced. In addition, the revised contents of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT in 2018 were compared with the contents of 2014 revision. As a result of the amendment in 2018 we conclude that Japanese Wholesale Market has changed from a market that guarantees fairness to a market that pursues efficiency only.
Third, we confirmed the structure of SAFact and introduced the amendment of SAFact since 2000. In addition, we tried to analyze the relationship between these amendments to the amendments of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT. We believe that the contents of the individual amendments have been strongly influenced by the amendments of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT in 1999 and 2004. Therefore the amendment of Japanese Wholesale Market ACT in 2018 is sensitive to our academic and business walkst.
In conclusion, we analyzed whether these sensitive responses are valid from the view of Comparative Law. For this purpose, we introduced the meaning of comparative Law. In this regard, the Japanese wholesale market and our wholesale market are not comparable. It was also criticized that the introduction of various institutions under the influence of Japan into our SAFact was also done without comparative legal arguments. Therefore, we argued that we should no longer be bound by Japanese Wholesale Market ACT, but should form our own legal system.
#일본 도매시장법
#농수산물도매시장
#농수산물 유통 및 가격안정에 관한 법률(농안법)
#농수산물 가격안정
#농수산물 유통
#Japanese Wholesale Market ACT
#Agricultural and seafood wholesale market
#ACT on Distribution and Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products(SAFact)
#Price Stabilization of Agricultural and Fishery Products
#Agricultural and seafood distribution
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 일본 도매시장법의 주요개정의 역사
Ⅲ. 우리나라 농안법의 개관
Ⅳ. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지방도매시장의 활성화 방안
식품유통연구
2017 .01
-
도매시장 물류기반의 온라인 농산물 거래시스템에 대한 소상공인의 이용의향 분석 연구
식품유통연구
2016 .01
-
A Comparative Study of Agricultural Products Wholesale Markets in the Philippines and South Korea for Future Development Planning
국제개발협력
2020 .11
-
도매시장법인 위탁수수료의 성격과 의미에 관한 연구
식품유통연구
2020 .01
-
한우농가 선호 도매시장 군집 분석
식품유통연구
2020 .01
-
제도와 정책이 기업 수익성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 한·일간 농산물 유통정책의 차이에 따른 도매시장법인 수익성을 중심으로
아태비즈니스연구
2021 .01
-
농산물 도매시장의 유통효율화를 위한 정보화 전략요인의 우선순위 분석
식품유통연구
2019 .01
-
농산물 유통 시설 입지가 인근 아파트 가격에 미치는 영향: 청주 도매시장과 대형마트를 중심으로
농업경제연구
2020 .01
-
수산물 도매유통 구조의 문제점과 개선방안: 가락도매시장 거래관계 분석을 중심으로
무역연구
2021 .12
-
쌀 가격의 유통단계별 인과성과 비대칭적 가격 전이 검정
식품유통연구
2021 .12
-
농안법에서 발견되는 도매시장거래제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구
법과 정책연구
2017 .01
-
「농수산물 유통 및 가격 안정에 관한 법률」에 대한 경쟁제한적 관점 분석
규제연구
2017 .06
-
농산물도매시장 하차거래 도입에 따른 시간비용 절감효과 분석: 가락농수산물도매시장 사례를 중심으로
유통경영학회지
2020 .04
-
초연결사회 도래에 따른유선가입자망 도매제공 법제화 소고- 접속유형 및 도매요금을 중심으로 -
과학기술법연구
2015 .01
-
Asymmetric Price Transmission in the Domestic Rice Market in South Korea
농업경제연구
2018 .01
-
가격 전이의 비대칭성을 통한 한우 등급 및 유통단계별 비효율성 검정
농업경영.정책연구
2021 .01
-
A study on the status and support policies of the small wholesale vendor in Korea
East Asian Journal of Business Economics
2016 .12
-
도매시장법인의 대금정산 회계기능과 발전방안에 관한 연구
세무회계연구
2018 .01
-
How to Boost Workers' Motivation in the Supply Chain based on the Difference between Wholesale and Retail Market
유통과학연구
2023 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-360-000116451