메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한위암학회 Journal of Gastric Cancer Journal of Gastric Cancer 제19권 제3호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
344 - 354 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: No standard technique has been established for esophagojejunal anastomosisduring laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer owing to the technicaldifficulty and high complication rate of this procedure. This study was performed to comparethe short-term outcomes of circular and linear stapling methods after LTG. Materials and Methods: A total of 106 patients treated between July 2010 and July 2018 weredivided into 2 groups according to the following anastomosis procedures: hemi-doublestaplingtechnique (HDST; circular stapling method; group C, n=77) or overlap method (linearstapling method; group L, n= 29). The clinicopathological features and postoperative outcomes,including complications, were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logisticregression model to identify the independent risk factors for anastomotic complications. Results: The incidence of anastomotic complications was significantly higher in group C thanin group L (28.0% vs. 6.9%, P=0.031). The incidence of anastomosis leakage did not differbetween the groups (6.5% vs. 6.9%, P=1.000). However, anastomosis stricture occurred onlyin group C (13% vs. 0%, P=0.018). Multivariate analysis showed that the anastomosis type wassignificantly related to the risk of anastomotic complications (P=0.045). Conclusions: The overlap method was superior to the HDST with respect to anastomoticcomplications, especially anastomosis stricture.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0