메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국전문물리치료학회 한국전문물리치료학회지 한국전문물리치료학회지 제2권 제2호
발행연도
1995.1
수록면
46 - 55 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and reliability ofgoniometric measurement of joint motion. Subjects were 40 healthy universitystudents. Measurements were performed by 4 inexperienced physical therapy students. Four different instruments were used and three readings were taken with eachinstrument in random order making a total of 12 readings for flexion of the rightelbow of each subject. Goniometers used were 1. uoiversal 2. fluid-basedgoniometer/inclinometer 3. digital LCD goniometer 4. electronic goniometer/torsiometer. The results were as follows: Concurrent validity was highest (r= .94) with theuniversal and digital LCD tools. Interrater reliability (Pearson Product MomentCorrelabon) was good for each tool. Interrater reliability calculated by ICC(2,1) washighest (.96) with the tensiometer and lowest (.78) with the digital LCD goniometer. Intrarater reliability calculated by ICC was excellent (≥.90 ) for all instruments. Theseresults show that concurrent validity, intrarater and interrater reliability are verygood in the used of all four types of goniometers/inclinometer/tensiometer, even withinexperienced raters. These results confirm the almost universal reliance on hand heldgoniometers for joint measurement by physical therapists as being a reliable practice. Further research should be done clinically with actual patients.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0