메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국환경법학회 환경법연구 환경법연구 제30권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
507 - 548 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ⅰ) In December 7. 2007, off the coast of Taean Korea, a crane barge of Samsung Heavy Industries Co., a nation’s heavy equipment manufacturer, has collided with a Hong Kong-registered oil tanker ‘Hebei Spirit’ and an enormous quantity of oil spilled over. About 300 kilometers of the seashore, including the coast of Taean, have been polluted and about forty thousand families have been damaged economically. According to ‘Hebei Spirit Oil Spill Report’ of IOPC(International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund), damage is estimated at 352-billion to 425-billion won. On the other hand, given the fact that victims maintain that damage counts up to trillions of won, there may be a keen controversy on the question of who will pay compensation over IOPC’s maximum compensation, 303-billion won. ⅱ) Hereupon, the legal responsibilities of the owner of Hebei Spirit and Samsung Heavy Industries Co. were reviewed in this study. With regard to the owner of Hebei Spirit, ‘non-fault responsibility’ should be applied on conformity with ‘Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage Act’ and the amount of compensation is detailedly stipulated in the law. However, the problem is that the legal responsibility of Samsung Heavy Industries Co. is not simple. There is a strong possibility that the company will refer to ‘limited liability’ in accordance with Article 746 of ‘Commercial Act.’ ⅲ) As at least ten thousand tons of oil spilled due to allision and the sea was polluted, victims are able to put in a claim for ‘obstacle removal’ or ‘obstacle prevention’ against those who caused oil spill. Since spilled oil was mostly removed by the government, victims and devoted volunteers, such expenses can be included in compensation on conformity with Article 746 of Commercial Act and Article 2 of Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage Act. Moreover, in respect to residual oil, victims can put in a claim for obstacle removal or obstacle prevention. In case that those who caused oil spill personally remove oil due to such claims, their acts may not be included in limited liability on the commercial law. ⅳ) In exercising the claim for damages, the causal relation between the harmful act and damage should be legally proved. The national court is expected to be of advantage to victims as it bases itself on probability. Specifically, the causal relationship between oil spill and damage is expected to be satisfactorily proved by probability. The problem is that compensation is difficult to be subtended. In other words, this is left the question of whether damages caused by mental anguish, unlicensed fishing, layoff, the price decrease of aquatic products, and the decrease of tourists can be compensated for. In such a case, victims should prove what they have been damaged. In order to do so, victims should collect supporting evidences and should preserve such evidences scrupulously.
#유류오염 #유류오염손해배상 #유류오염손해배상보장법 #무과실책임 #상법상 책임제한 #인과관계 #증거우월설 #Oil Pollution #Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage #Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage Act #Non-fault Responsibility #Limited Liability on the Commercial Law #Causal Relation #Preponderance of Evidence

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청
/ 2001 / 환경법 / 박영사 google schola Fritz Baur / / Lehrbuch des Sachenrechts, 16. Aufl google schola Hager G?ter / 1961 / Umweltsch?en und Leistungsf?igkeit des Deliktsrechts, NJW 1986 google schola Manfred Wolf / / Sachenrecht, 13. Aufl google schola Michael Kloepfer / 1989 / Umweltrecht google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0