메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국의학교육학회 Korean Journal of Medical Education Korean Journal of Medical Education 제21권 제3호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
279 - 285 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Self-assessment is important for learning. But, the reliability of self-assessment has long been questioned. We investigated this problem in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) setting. Methods: Forty third-year nursing students who participated in the OSCE were given the same checklist that was used for assessment by the examiners after they finished the OSCE. Then, the scores that were calculated by the examiners and examinees were compared, measuring the average, correlation, difference in score between examinee and examiner, difference in score according to the examinee's level, and Z-score. Results: Scores that were made by the examinees were significantly higher than those of the examiners (average 72.34 vs. 64.03), between which there was a loose positive correlation (r=0.34). The correlation coefficient increased (r=0.62) when a difference in score (examinee-examiner) was compared with the examiner score. When examinees were divided into 3 groups according to their scores, the difference tended to become less as the scores of examinee rose. When the Z-score was compared with the level of the examinee, examinees who had higher scores evaluated themselves lower than the examiners, and examinees with lower scores assessed themselves higher than the examiners. Conclusion: According to comparison of averages or correlation analysis, self- assessment by the examinee appeared to be less reliable. But when data were analyzed using difference in score, examinee levels, and Z-score, a certain tendency developed. This pattern may be due to the heterogeneity of the examinee group. Selection of appropriate analysis methods might be important to estabilish the reliability of self-assessment skills.
#Self assessment #Clinical competence #Students #Nursing

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청
Antonelli MA / 1997 / Accuracy of second-year medical students' self-assessment of clinical skills / Acad Med 72 : S63 ~ S65 google schola Arnold L / 1985 / Self- evaluation in undergraduate medical education: a longitudinal perspective / J Med Educ 60 : 21 ~ 28 google schola Cho MS / 1994 / A comparative study between self evaluation and superior evaluation in the nursing performance appraisal / 석사 / Seoul National University google schola Coutts L / 1999 / Predictors of student self- assessment accuracy during a clinical performance exam: comparisons between over-estimators and under-estimators of SP-evaluate google schola Das M / 1998 / Self and tutor evaluations in problem-based learning tutorials: is there a relationship? / Med Educ 32 : 411 ~ 418 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0