메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한소화기내시경학회 Clinical Endoscopy Clinical Endoscopy 제51권 제1호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
66 - 71 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: Because of the national screening program for colorectal carcinoma in The Netherlands, the number ofcolonoscopies has increased. In case of incomplete colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) and double-ballooncolonoscopy (DBc) are alternative options. This study evaluated cecal intubation rate and pathology detection rate in the previouslyunexplored part of the colon, complication rate of DBc, and CTC results after incomplete colonoscopy. Methods: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary referral hospital regarding DBc and CTC reports from cases with incompletecolonoscopy. Results: Sixty-three DBcs were performed after incomplete colonoscopy. Cecal intubation rate was 95%. Detection rate was 58% (5%carcinoma and 3% high-grade dysplastic adenoma). CTC preceded 54% of DBcs and 62% of CTC findings were confirmed. In 16%,a biopsy was taken, and in 60%, an intervention (mostly polypectomy) was performed. One major complication (1.5%) occurred, i.e.,arterial bleeding due to polypectomy necessitating right hemicolectomy. CTC (n=213) showed a possible lesion in 35%, and could beconfirmed by follow-up endoscopy or surgery in 65%. Conclusions: DBc is effective and safe for completion of colon inspection in incomplete colonoscopy. In patients with a high likelihoodof pathology, DBc is preferred over CTC.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0