메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제25권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
37 - 76 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this thesis is theorizing that a confidence liability is distinguished from a liability and a liability by a tort. The confidence liability is a legal liability that imposes obligation to perform a contract or obligation to pay for damages on confidence-maker under a fixed condition. Its final legal ground is article 2 of Civil Law[Loyalty and Good Faith]. It is originated from fides in the Roman law, Treue and Gewere in the Germanic law, Estoppel in the Anglo-American law, Externality theory and Confidence liability theory in the German law. It is distinguished from a liability by a juristic act in that a obligation to perform a contract or a obligation to pay for damages is imposed on confidence-maker in spite of absence of his self-determination and there are special relations between both. And it is also distinguished from a liability by a tort in that it requires special relations between both. In connection with a liability by a juristic act, their distinction should be started from understand about declaration of intention. The confidence liability is among conceptual elements of the principle of private autonomy. In this respect, it plays a complementary role for the principle of private autonomy with a liability of a juristic act by self-determination. If following requirements are fulfilled, the confidence liability comes into effect. That is, it requires ① existence of special relations between confidence-maker and relier, ② existence of any juristic marks, ③ existence of cause imputing to products of any marks similar to juristic act, ④ relier's recognition of the existence of any juristic marks, ⑤ relier belief in that any marks similar to juristic act are different from the truth and so his/her managing any juristic acts to it. When above requirements are fulfilled, effects come from the confidence liability, if it is not expressly stipulated in the text about them, they depend on following: first, in case that a case is discussed only between confidence-maker and relier, ① when confidence-maker knew products of any marks similar to juristic act, if there is no negligence in relier's belief in them, confidence-maker should be charged with liability to perform a contract, and if there is negligence in relier's belief in them, confidence-maker should be charged with liability to pay for damages(reliance interest). ② when confidence-maker didn't know products of any marks similar to juristic act through his/her negligence, confidence-maker should be charged with liability to pay for damages(reliance interest) only as there is negligence in relier's belief in them. ③ when confidence-maker didn't know products of any marks similar to juristic act without his/her negligence, confidence-maker should not be charged with anything in principle. Second, in case that a case is discussed among actually rightful person, confidence-maker, and relier, confidence-maker's products of any marks similar to juristic act are taken in accordance with lack of authority to represent. That is, in this case, even though actually rightful person knew that facts, he/she should not be charged with anything in principle. In addition, this theory attempts to theorize with Confidence liability theory about several particular issues in Civil Law.
#신뢰책임 #신뢰보호 #외관이론 #법률행위 #의사표시 #Confidence liability #Protection of confidence #Externality theory #Juristic act #Declaration of intention

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (55)

참고문헌 신청
/ / www.wwp.ch/pulications/394.pdf google schola / 1998 / Brechb?l, Haftung aus erwecktem Konzernvertrauen, Diss. Bern google schola Bydlinski / 1967 / Privatautonomie und objektive Grundlagen des verpflichtenden Rechtsgesch?tes, Wien und New York google schola Canaris / 1971 / Die Vertrauenshaftung im Deutshen Privatrecht / M?hen google schola Craushaar / 1969 / Der Einfluss des Vertrauens a.d. Privatrechtsbildung / M?chen google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0