메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중국문화학회 중국학논총 중국학논총 제27호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
205 - 235 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
What kinds of policies states adopt toward superpower state under unipolar system? Some argue that states attempt to balance against superpower because it threats other states' security while others believe that states do not balance against superpower due to either huge disparity of capabilities between superpower and other states or roles of existing international institutions that provide benefits to other states. In this regard, this study examines foreign policies of China under the U.S. unipolar system to verify explanatory power of the existing approaches' arguments. China has adopted bandwagoning policies in dealing with the U.S. initiating 'global war on terror' and nonproliferation regime by helping the U.S. as well as in maintaining international economic order by participating WTO. Conversely it also has attempted to take balancing policies against strengthening of U.S.-Japan alliance and U.S. initiating MD system by strengthening internal military capabilities and by consolidating security cooperation with Russia. Unlike the arguments of the existing approaches, the results of the case studies clearly show that China has adopted both balancing and bandwagoning policies toward the U.S. The limits of existing approach in explaining Chinese foreign policies under U.S. unipolar system mainly stemmed from their analysis' emphasis on international level factors while ignoring the role of domestic factors in determining Chinese foreign policies.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0