메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법정책학회 법과 정책연구 법과 정책연구 제7권 제2호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
513 - 536 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The the theory of the Joint Principal through Conspiracy is that, when two or more persons have jointly criminal plan and prepare in order to commit a crime, each of them shall be punished as a principal offender for the committed crime, even though one person who took part in such a plan actually commit the plotted crime. In a commonly accepted theory of the Joint Principal through Conspiracy, some criminologists oppose this theory on the grounds that it lacks in theoretical basis and the base of positive law, others argue that this theory might be overused or abused, in respect to the security of human rights. And, practically, it seems that the judicial decisions are affirmative to apply the theory to the organised or the co-operated crime. In the actual state of contemporary crimes, the boss of this collective organization, seldom or never practise the crime that they have conspired. But the boss have necessity that shall be punished more than the actual principal offender. This practical necessity makes court decisions have applied this theory to co-operated crime, but, today, more restrictively. In conclusion, there must be a reasonable limitation in applying this theory, lest this theory should be overused or abused. Also I hope that Korean courts would be more restrictive in applying the theory of the Joint Principal through Conspiracy and preserve in their effort to make improvement of Judicial right.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0