메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대구사학회 대구사학 대구사학 제3권 제76호
발행연도
2004.1
수록면
399 - 434 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Liberty is one of the most important thoughts of Rousseau. How can we catch the way Rousseau use the liberty? Rousseau classified the concept of liberty into four sorts such as natural, civil, moral and/or political liberty. Natural liberty is a conjectured liberty that is assured by idealized natural state. Civil liberty is the production made from the agreement of original social contract and the performance of people’s sovereign. Moral and/or political liberty is the one achieved by people’s autonomous decision-making. In general many scholars accept the prescription of Isaiah Berlin to Rousseau’s recognition on liberty. He claimed that Rousseau’s liberty is not a negative but a positive one. However, his thought also implicates the characteristic of negative liberty which is reflected in the presupposition; that is, peoples should be ‘forced to be free’ by laws. Rousseau comprehended the positive law, which is enacted by realization of people’s general wil, as an instrument to assure civil liberty. In fact the arguments of Rousseau on liberty are very complex. Thus the two concepts of liberty classified by Berlin can not be properly applied to Rousseau’s thought. Rather Rousseau’s notion crosses and traverses the Berlin’s two concepts of liberty. By this point I believe that Rousseau’s thought serves as a means of searching for the third concept of liberty for present day society.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0